• Hobart_the_GoKart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kara was effectively stealing 20% of LRT fares over the 13-year period; one in five coins that were fed into the machines by the paying public ended up in his shaving bag, amounting to around 2 million customer journeys. It seems inconceivable that he wasn’t caught sooner.

    This really does seem inconceivable. I’m an industry accountant and worked in the safe room counting drawers for a supermarket and a cafeteria. I lose it when I’m not balanced, even $10 on a 200k deposit. How… How was someone not noticing 20%?? Hell he deserves it with the lack of controls in place. Maybe things were different then…

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s the government, it’s not their money. Finding the discrepancy is extra work which is kryptonite to government employees.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Its extra work for any employee, the government just doesnt pretend like it’s going to reward you like corporate america pretends it will do.

        In both cases you just get more work to do, but the latter has better marketing.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s written that they did notice it but were unable to pinpoint the problem and thought it is a software bug. Reminds of a recent story where an actual software bug got post workers in the UK jail time and huge fines because they were accused of stealing that money

    • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is the City of Edmonton. Having worked there the least surprising part of this story is that even when they noticed, instead of investigating further, they wrote it off as an error.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I work in a firm that does accounting and so far we’ve been accurate to the cent, every single time.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s sort of implied by the article that there was not sophistication in the 80s to audit the money. And then the couple times the money was audited, it was chalked up to a software glitch. If this happened today, yes, it would be counted and corroborated basically daily, but in the 80s?