Maybe after a few too wrong moves, he’s trying to tank the company and make people think he’s doing it on purpose so he could say that all this time he’s been doing it on purpose. On purpose on purpose.
I believe that all of these major players are being controlled at almost gunpoint into destroying their platforms and making horrible business decisions (facebook, twitter, youtube, etc).
I’d also add that a defense of ignorance becomes harder to attribute his moves to when he is surrounded by people who inform him. Choosing not to listen to them seems malicious.
Almost like it’s on purpose…
Maybe after a few too wrong moves, he’s trying to tank the company and make people think he’s doing it on purpose so he could say that all this time he’s been doing it on purpose. On purpose on purpose.
or he’s actually just sabotaging one of the largest western social networks through weaponizing his gross incompetence
I believe that all of these major players are being controlled at almost gunpoint into destroying their platforms and making horrible business decisions (facebook, twitter, youtube, etc).
They overextended in an era of easy money. Belts tighten and they still want to hit their growth targets, so they take away some sesame seeds.
I think people are realizing they don’t really like the burger as much as they used to.
“I’m so great, I can bankrupt a multibillion dollar company and lose tens of billions of dollars of my own money!”
Weird flex, but ok
Don’t attribute to malice what can easily be attributed to ignorance
True, but I don’t think one prohibits the other.
I’d also add that a defense of ignorance becomes harder to attribute his moves to when he is surrounded by people who inform him. Choosing not to listen to them seems malicious.