Federal labor regulators allege that SpaceX illegally fired employees who publicly criticized Elon Musk, the exploration company’s founder and CEO.

According to allegations laid out in a complaint filed Wednesday by a regional office of the National Labor Relations Board, SpaceX wrongfully terminated eight employees and interrogated dozens more in 2022 after the workers wrote and shared an open letter calling for the company’s leadership to condemn Musk’s “disparaging” and “sexually charged” comments on social media.

The letter criticized SpaceX management for what the authors called the company’s failure to tackle a culture of “sexism, harassment and discrimination” within its workplace, the NLRB said in the complaint. Separately, they asked SpaceX to “condemn” Musk’s “harmful Twitter behavior.”

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    11 months ago

    Amazing to watch this man undo decades of pr firms and countless dollars spent by rich people to make themselves look good. Carnegie must be rolling in his grave. What a spectacle.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      We’re still in the middle of the second act. The third act starts in about 10 to 15 years when the unbridled philanthropy happens attempting to whitewash the actions of the second act in search of redemption.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          11 months ago

          Us old folks have lived through a lifetime with Bill Gates. The PR isn’t for us. Its for the people born after he did all his bad stuff that never experienced it firsthand. They’ll only see the philanthropy.

          Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others did this successfully. When the Today Show comes on the air and the announcer says “Live from Rockefeller center…!” does anyone today think of the carnage John D left in his wake?

          • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            True. I guess I’m hoping his recent fuck up with keeping the COVID vaccine from being more widely distributed might galvanize the youths. That and the Epstein flight logs.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Tax avoidance is certainly one factor, but to dismiss old people’s desire for legacy would be dishonest. If it was just for tax reasons, the person’s name wouldn’t be requested to be included in the philanthropic venture.

              Example:

              It could have been called the “New York Cancer Center” but it wasn’t.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s as much just ego, honestly.

                Like how Trump needs to put his name on literally every single thing that is his.