WHAT IS THIS BULLSHIT?!?!? T VALUES? P VALUES? OH WE JUST CHOOSE A RANDOM NUMBER WE LIKE TO BE THE THRESHOLD FOR NORMALCY? OH THATS SO COOL AND OBJECTIVE AND MATHMATICAL. SOUNDS LIKE BULLSHIT TO ME ACTUALLY. OH YOU WANT ME TO DO A XI^2 TEST? HOW ABOUT YOU XI^2 MY ASS! FUCKING MEASURE THE CRITICAL Z VALUE OF MY TAINT. LOSER.

  • AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hear you, but that feels like more of a physics model vs. engineering heuristic dichotomy rather than math vs. statistics.

    (If you haven’t seen it already, the Engineer Guy did a lovely little series of videos about engineering heuristics)

    The kind of math I find alluring doesn’t operate in an idealized version of reality; rather, it’s completely divorced from reality, instead living in universes defined solely by mathematical axioms. It’s only incidentally that real-world applications that arise from these investigations (e.g. modern cryptography from the work of centuries of number theory nerds). But to each their own! In general, I prefer the concrete to the abstract, but statistics is an exception.