• Corbin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    PLDI is political; in general, any sort of language-design process is political. This is because language is expressive and also constraining, so the expressible and easy-to-express concepts in any language are its de facto default policies.

    Social conservatives tend to produce languages which are patrician and sadistic in their demands upon their users; C and Go, D, Hoon and Nock, Hare, and V all come to mind. They see these languages as offering “choice” and power to the end-user, and see languages which have redundant structures and safety, like Ada or Pascal, as “bondage & discipline”.

    You’re likely familiar with the frustration of using designed-by-committee languages, too; say, C++ or Python. These systems tend to evolve social conservatism as a way of preventing an explosion of features, as happened to Perl and is happening to Rust.

    Hopefully this is good food for thought. Your choice of language is not politically neutral, but occurs within a social context and has policy implications. Work at a PHP shop for a few years and you’ll suddenly care quite a bit about which languages you use!

      • Corbin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        In this case, we are discussing the leadership of a community project; the leaders are the ones who set policy for the project. In this sense, yeah, it’s a political situation.

        Given your username, I’m a little surprised that you wouldn’t recognize that the leaders of community projects are politically important…