• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, thousands of years of established language development is wrong

    Yes, it is. Island has an ‘s’ in it as a stylistic choice to Latinize a word that has no Latin root. Literally is now defined as “not literally” which is absurd. That’s established language development.

    If people keep using “it’s” as possessive then it will become possessive, and nothing will be lost.

    • Leg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Language sticklers are an interesting phenomenon to me. Language has always evolved with its users. The only rule is that we understand each other when we use it, and that rule allows massive flexibility. Watching it evolve in real-time is more fun than trying to police someone for using an apostrophe.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Language sticklers are an interesting phenomenon to me

        It’s weird if you think about it. They’re basically saying “English was exactly correct at an arbitrary moment in time that I chose.” Anything different before that (such as ‘iland’) is wrong, but any new changes are an abomination.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s totally not fair. Some things are more wrong than others. And the “everything is correct even” language people are just as insufferable as the “there is exactly one correct usage” people.

          Using it’s instead of its is not slang, or an evolving use or alternative spelling. It’s simply wrong.