Gov. Greg Abbott on Saturday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have expanded vote-by-mail access for people with disabilities — specifically people who are blind or paralyzed and need assistance marking their ballot.

      • unwellsnail@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        More absolutely predictable than ironic, it will not impact him and he has no love for the disability community. I imagine he has a ton of internalized ableism and believes himself as different from other disabled people. He has a long history of doing things like this, look up his tort reform work. As a wheelchair user I really hate that one of the most prominent wheelchair users in politics is this fuck.

      • SapphicFemme@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably has someone vote for them or doesn’t need to vote due to wealth and status. I am guessing here.

          • SapphicFemme@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh wow that’s messed up.

            I’ve had the understanding a lot of these laws were meant to impact the poor and working class for a long time. Rare to see someone Aldo know that too.

  • xradeon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favorite thing about mail in voting is Utah. Utah for years had a very successful mail in voting operation. Everyone loved it. A few critics here and there, but generally well respected. Then Trump lost and now mail in voting is a very bad thing, don’t you know! (even thought Trump won by an overwhelming majority in Utah via mail in voting)

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps relative to evangelical Christian denominations. There’s still enough support that he won the state pretty handily.

  • Nooch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    God Dammnit! This goddamn piss baby fucking sucks! I wish nothing but bad luck for him in the future. The guy is awful, and he gives no fucks about anybody but himself. Fuck you Greg Abbot you piece of shit piss baby. Every piece of news I hear about him, is how he’s gone and oppressed some people. Guy contributes negative value to society.

    • SCmSTR@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this place and the fediverse we’re in now is supposed to be based in anti censorship? So you should theoretically be able to just outright say you hope he dies? I’m not actually sure on that though. Any mods or admins here if you want to correct me, please do. Because, I do hope abbott chokes on a brussel sprout and dies. Him, desantis, trump, and carlson can all join limbaugh in the forever nothing with the rest of the fucking nazis. They can all fight strokes and lose. Again, mods, let me know if this isn’t okay, I’ll gladly check myself hahaha. (I’m not used to being able to say stuff like this and it feels… dirty or wrong to just say)

      • omarciddo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes and no. Yes, there is no Fediverse-wide admin to moderate content since everything is decentralized, but instances and their subcommunities do, and each one is free implement their own rules. We’re on Beehaw, which is pretty strongly committed to fostering a community with a positive culture and tone, and while there is a good amount of leeway for free discussion (from what I’ve seen in just 2 weeks here), I imagine getting too vocal about wishing that kind of thing might get attention from the Beehaw mods at some point.

        Not that I don’t fully understand your emotions.

  • Spitfire@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not surprised. I’m sure he’ll claim it’s due to “voter fraud” but many places vote by mail without issue.

    • hihusio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Colorado votes by mail and it’s regarded as the gold standard in regards to integrity and efficiency.

    • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone else remember when Rump said the quiet part out loud and if more people voted “you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again”?

    • sparkl_motion@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      WA state has vote by mail, and every registered voter gets an informational booklet detailing the candidates.

      I’ve never heard of any issues here.

    • halcyon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guys, it was never really about voter fraud. They are now trying to raise the voting age to 25! Like, this is all math for them. They know like 1 in 5 real people support them (mainly people over 60), so they need to make sure only 3 in 10 people get a chance to vote and that those people are their people, suppress suppress and suppress the vote.

  • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know Republicans generally vote against their own interests, but Abbott pushing back against stuff like this and the tort law that got him his money in the first place will always be wild to me.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is particularly ghoulish considering Abbott’s own history. Coming from the same place as allowing a law to pass that prohibits the same sort of lawsuit that made him wealthy enough to run for governor of Texas.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He has house servants and assistants to drive him to the polls, and almost certainly can take as much time from work as he wants to go do it on the taxpayer dime. Self-interest is the only driving force for people like him.

    • Nooch@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very much, it was awful. It was below freezing and we did not have power for 3 days strait (and i consider myself lucky it came back when it did! some where out for 2 weeks!). All the gas stations ran out of gas, every hotel room that had power was overbooked. They sent out a notice urging people to stay inside, but some elderly died in their armchairs in their living room. Froze to death, in Texas. This goddamn piss baby doesn’t give a shit!

  • BReel@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gosh. Wouldn’t it just be horrible if it was easier for people to participate in a democracy? Thank goodness for them stronk republicans! /s

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    He is just afraid that people with disabilities will vote progressive since they probably have more empathy.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course he did. He and his party don’t want people with disabilities to vote, because then they might have to actually start paying attention to them in ways that go beyond giving campaign-season lip service to tEh TrOoPs.