Donald Trumpās victory in the Iowa caucus was as dominant as expected, underscoring the exceedingly narrow path available to any of the Republican forces hoping to prevent his third consecutive nomination. And yet, for all Trumpās strength within the party, the results also hinted at some of the risks the GOP will face if it nominates him again.
Based on Trumpās overwhelming lead in the poll conducted of voters on their way into the voting, the cable networks called the contest for Trump before the actual caucus was even completed. It was a fittingly anticlimactic conclusion to a caucus contest whose result all year has never seemed in doubt. In part, that may have been because none of Trumpās rivals offered Iowa voters a fully articulated case against him until Florida Governor Ron DeSantis unleashed more pointed arguments against the front-runner in the final days.
ā¦
Trumpās relative weakness among college-educated voters in the 2016 GOP primary presaged the alienation from him in white-collar suburbs that grew during his presidency. Though Bidenās approval among those voters has declined since 2021, Trumpās modest showing even among the college-educated voters willing to turn out for a GOP caucus likely shows that resistance to him also remains substantial. When the results are tallied, Trump might win all 99 counties in Iowa, an incredible achievement if he manages it. But Trump drew well under his statewide percentage in Polk County, the stateās most populous; in fast-growing Dallas County; and in Story and Johnson, the counties centered on Iowa State University and the University of Iowa. (Johnson is the one county where Trump trails as of now.) Those are all the sorts of places that have moved away from the GOP in the Trump years.
Also noteworthy was votersā response to an entrance-poll question about whether they would still consider Trump fit for the presidency if he was convicted of a crime. Nearly two-thirds said yes, which speaks to his strength within the Republican Party. But about three in 10 said no, which speaks to possible problems in a general election. That result was consistent with the findings in a wide array of polls that somewhere between one-fifth and one-third of GOP partisans believe that Trumpās actions after the 2020 election were a threat to democracy or illegal. How many of those Republican-leaning voters would ultimately support him will be crucial to his viability if he wins the nomination. On that front, it may be worth filing away that more than four in 10 college graduates who participated in the caucus said they would not view Trump as fit for the presidency if heās convicted of a crime, the entrance poll found.
Those are problems Trump will need to confront on another day, if he wins the nomination. For now, he has delivered an imposing show of strength within a party that he has reshaped in his belligerent, conspiratorial image. The winter gloom in Iowa may not be any bleaker than the spirits tonight of the dwindling band of those in the GOP hoping to loosen Trumpās iron grip on the party.
I mean, thatās a loaded question. āFit for presidencyā because āconvicted of a crimeā? What / which crime are we talking about? If weāre talking about defamationā¦ Geez, the bar is so incredibly low now. It wasnāt long ago that misspelling potato or screaming on a stage made you unfit for president. Granted, Iām certain that āconvicted of a crimeā is irrelevant with this electorate. Youād think two impeachments alone would disqualify someone from the presidency. Moreover, if I were given the option of a Biden āconvicted of a crimeā or a not-convicted Trump, Iād still vote for Biden.
We NEED Ranked Choice Voting. Iād love to see the entry polls ask voters to rank their candidates outside the threat of a Biden victory. āGiven a hypothetically guaranteed Republican victory, rank the candidates as youād preferā. This needs to be done for every GOP and Dem primary election going forward. Having CNN publish ranked choice entry poll results would enforce the validity of the process, if not at least enter it into the discussion.