Did Reddit get massive because of Digg users making a beeline towards them or were they already big before that?

  • hyperyog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean I don’t mind the current state of Lemmy right now, in fact I’m actually quite liking how it is right now. It’ll probably take a lot of time to even get on the same level as Reddit if it ever does, however I’m seeing so much users, moderators, and devs who are committed to making this platform work and that in and of itself is amazing to see. Things like this actually show there is a human side to technology and that we can make it work. Anyways that’s my food for thought.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree. Everyone is nicer here, and y’all seem older and more intelligent too. You can actually have a proper conversation on Lemmy without some idiot teenager making a dumb joke.

      I also like the “Hot” sorting algorithm for comments way better than “Best” on reddit. On Lemmy, you can actually show up to a conversation late and have a chance at your top-level comment being seen, without having to resort to hijacking other people’s comments. On reddit, you could forget about it once a post became popular enough to hit the front page. You’ll just be shouting into the void.

      • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s because it’s still new and not super user friendly/a little confusing. I am still figuring things out here, but I love it because the tone and vibe remind me of the older net before it became super accessible and the unwashed masses started to outnumber the real nerds.

        I’ve seen it happen with many sites, boards, communities, etc. A haven is created, it becomes popular, it has a golden age, it becomes flooded with idiots/spam/bots/trash, dies, and a new place arises and the cycle starts again. I watched it happen with icq, AOL chat rooms (and AOL itself), MySpace, Facebook, reddit, YouTube…

        Some take longer than others to go through parts of the cycle, but they always do.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know. I went through this before when Digg killed itself off and everyone migrated to the underdog, reddit.
          With everything on the web being so centralized and corporate (especially compared to 90s internet), Lemmy is a breath of fresh air… for now…

          Let’s just try to enjoy what we have, while we have it.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          One positive to this is that with each new beginning the technology has improved, and there is a richer ecosystem of features as things have been iterated on over the years. The customizability of the UI on Lemmy for example is awesome. It is a brave new world right now, and I am excited to see where the platform goes, and what cool new things we all discover together as we walk this road of building a new and hopefully vibrant community.

    • Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like your positive spin.

      I’m just thrilled it’s decentralized. I’m so sick of being advertised at. I’m so sick of being asked for monthly subscriptions. I’m really feeling this open source vibe or however you want to label it.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Monthly subscriptions aren’t bad - they’re the solution to removing the avalanche of ads we are inundated by. The user gets to pick and choose which services they want to use.

        One of the problems is opening up services to free users so you can keep them captured and squash competition, and at the same time push subscriptions to them via ads constantly.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People definitely need to accept that you can’t have it both ways - servers have costs, and either the users pay those costs directly through subscriptions or indirectly through advertising.

          • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agreed. However, these data collectors and aggregators need to be submit to data privacy regulations and checks and balances on how they use this data. Currently they muddy the waters on how this data is handled and distributed, and in the smokescreen use/sell our data however they want for profit, and our data end up being less secure.