• Legendsofanus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Again, it required no batteries — much desired by Zenith, as the company didn’t want customers to think a TV was broken when the battery died.”

    Was this really that big of a concern? Did people really think that LMAO

      • Legendsofanus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where remotes are scarce? What do you mean by that, are you talking about the time when they came in or now

        • joby@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They were talking about the device from the article, when a non-wired remote was a new and neat idea. Also, standardized, long-lasting batteries may not have been as common as we’re used to these days.

          That’s the world where the original engineers decided not to go with an electronic device, so they didn’t have customers buying the bleeding edge tech and thinking it had bricked a couple of months after purchase because “did you change the battery?” wasn’t a consideration they were used to yet

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re planning on selling 1 million units, a half of a percent of people making that mistake means a big headache.