• Blisterexe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    mint is similar (its based on ubuntu) but it is significantly better imo

    • kvadd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sort of newbie here as well. Why is it better?

      I used Ubuntu for about 2 years in 2006 to 2008, but have been on Windows since. I like Ubuntu, and looking in to dual booting with Windows now. Should I go for Mint instead of Ubuntu?

      • Moshpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Canonical, the company that has been taking care of Ubuntu, has made many bad choices (including Amazon launcher, telemetry, Snap packages…). Linux Mint rises as an alternative because of these bad decisions.

        • kvadd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh damn, I wasn’t aware. Never using Ubuntu again if they try shit like that. But if Canonical goes under, won’t that effect Mint? I mean if it is based on Ubuntu? (If my understand of it is correct)

      • Blisterexe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You should probably go for mint because of the reasons the other person that replied mentioned, but it’s your choice, go with whichever you like (you may also like zorinos)