Context: Even though Chromium has native support for AVIF, a very nice image format, Microsoft goes out of their way to remove it from Edge, which is a chromium fork. Jpeg XL (JXL) (not to be confused with Jpeg (JPG) or Jpeg 2000 (jpg2k) ) is another nice image format, which, IIRC, is only supported in Firefox.

  • drkt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If you want to piss people off, support JPEG XL

    Every time you mention it, Google shills WebP supporters come out of the woodworks to do their song and dance!

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’'m working on a website right now, trying to choose which image format to use. I think I’m gonna store both webp and AVIF versions on the server, and have Javascript figure out which format is best for the browser automatically (for images that have to be loaded with Javascript anyway).If I have time, I might even try detecting if JXL is supported via third-party extension and using that too.

      • drkt@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        have Javascript figure out which format is best for the browser

        Please don’t- HTML has native image fallback functionality https://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_picture.asp

        
             
             
             
        
        

        I don’t know if type=“image/jxl”> is the correct type but I’m halfway out the door right now, sorry! You may have to look that up :p

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Thanks for the info! I was already suspecting that this could be done without JS, just didn’t know how.