• Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree; I think there’s a huge middle ground you’re ignoring.

    “Everyone should be treated equally” is a pretty simple concept that a lot of (maybe even a majority of) people agree with. It’s possible to fully subscribe to that ideology while also thinking that the explosion of labels that gen z is infatuated with is silly.

    • Umechan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rhetoric I described is absolutely being weaponized against people. If you follow the reason behind the arugment that someone is “normal, not cis”, then you would then conclude that trans and nb people are not normal. Anyone who accepts that argument would likely conclude that not only are trans women not “normal women”, and trans men not “normal men”, but that they are not actually real women or men.

      As for gen z being infatuated with labels, I will admit I don’t understand many of them, but I’m fine with them if they help people communicate their identity better. I wouldn’t claim that any labels are redundant or just attention seeking without any actual evidence or reasoning behind it.

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m taking issue with your first example, not your second. There’s a world of difference.

        But when people say queer people are obsessed with labels […] what they’re almost certainly taking issue with is non-cisheteronormativity being recognized and validated.

        This statement I think is incorrect.

    • Evkob@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you think it’s silly?

      Even if it were silly, is that sufficient reason to not treat others with respect?