Flatpaks aren’t huge at all. This is a debunked myth. I can’t recommend reading this article enough.

  • devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    But it occupies a freaking crazy amount of space. People do really be on drugs when going with these religious strong stances.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah last time I tried Flatpak it took like 3 apps to completely fill up my laptop’s root partition and use nearly as much space as my Arch install on its own. For some reason they all used a different platform/runtime/whatever they call it. Oh this one uses the latest Gnome 3, this other one the version before, and that other one Gnome 4. Same with KDE apps, they’d also pull different versions of KDE frameworks and Qt versions. How many versions of Gnome and KDE do I need, just run it on whatever’s the latest.

      Granted, my fault for not having quite a big enough root partition. But I’m skeptical about the methodology of the article because it doesn’t match real world experience at all, at least for me.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The space isn’t taken up by one app. Its the platform dependency that takes up a bit of storage.

      If you install one app is feels huge but the next one that depends on gtk or qt will be small.

      Its the same think with desktops. If you go to a bare bones no GUI Linux system and install Firefox it would be a huge download.