• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting, I was about to agree with the post you replied to. I dont know what neo-liberalism is and the Wikipedia entry isn’t specific enough to this conversation,so o don’t know who to agree or is agree with, but ….

    I don’t see how free market or capitalism is inherently the problem or can’t be the solution.

    However it’s government’s job to establish the market, set a fair playing field, set common rules to encourage development toward the needs of society. However government is who abandoned their responsibility. At least in the US , we seem to rarely have a functional government, and much of the action taken shows we are owned by the market, rather than the other way around. Where is the government responsible to voters, rather than the rich or corporate interests? Where is our leadership dedicated to improving things for their constituents, rather than their benefactors? Where is the altriistic leadership, rather than petty or spiteful? Where is the leadership who actually believes in our form of government, our principles, the Constituion at the root, rather than taking advantage of them as a source of power and to accumulate wealth?

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      However it is the government’s job to establish…

      Great thought, and the main area of disagreement between Neoliberals and Classical Liberals.

      As for the rest, while I definitely share your frustration at our government, it’s important to note that Congress members vote overwhelmingly in ways their constituents want. Constituents regularly support their own representatives, while still holding that Congress is broken/corrupt/etc. The real problem is Americans hotly and widely disagree on core issues of identity.

      There’s no easy solution here, but I’m big on chasing evidenced-based policies and solutions wherever possible.