• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’re right, we should do nothing and let these irresponsible companies keep it.

    • aelwero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or maybe give it to the people who were actually affected by it? The ones in who’s names the judgement was made?

      It literally says it’s a punitive assessment for emotional damages… I don’t think the government got its feelings hurt…

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree with your first point. But the only thing most companies understand is money. A punitive fine will save lives and prevent future negligence.

        • aelwero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          A punitive assessment for the emotional damage from deaths and destruction of personal property on a grand scale, including the environment the damaged parties live in, is entirely appropriate.

          Levying it under that pretense, but putting it in a discretionary fund under purview of government is essentially a 100% tax on the damages done to the victims.

          Claiming it will be used to benefit those victims is a whitewash… It never goes to the victims unless it’s awarded to them.

          There’s absolutely nothing wrong with the punitive assessment, my objection is purely to the recipient.