This was way more courteous than I expected, they actually went ahead and answered to any possible intent they might have had underneath the delusional nonsense.
This is good judging. There is a general directive for judges to interpret the arguments and filings of non-lawyers with very generous interpretation of what they are trying to argue. This judge did their best and also shored up their case against an appeal. Not that this lunatic would be cogent enough to ever appeal a ruling.
This was way more courteous than I expected, they actually went ahead and answered to any possible intent they might have had underneath the delusional nonsense.
This is good judging. There is a general directive for judges to interpret the arguments and filings of non-lawyers with very generous interpretation of what they are trying to argue. This judge did their best and also shored up their case against an appeal. Not that this lunatic would be cogent enough to ever appeal a ruling.