Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it’s complicated.

  • infamousbelgian@waste-of.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The story is not about bombing Japan.

    Yes, that was a war crime. Yes, that was terrible.

    But if you know the story of Oppenheimer, or seen the movie, he did not decide anything. The military took over at that moment in time.

    So if it was a movie about the military, this had to be shown. But it is about him. So a suggestion (as is clearly in the movie for about the last hour or so) is more than enough of you ask me.

    • ormr@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re totally right and the discussion (as so many these days) is completely bollocks.

      Since when should the public have the right to demand what an artist ought to put in his work or must not omit. I don’t get it…

      • infamousbelgian@waste-of.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed, but that is not what the movie is about.

        He did say (no one knows what he believed) that just having the bomb would mean world peace…

            • ormr@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Typical aggressive online SJW behaviour. Preaching absolute truths and spitting condemnations as if no one had thought about it before. Obviously, the world can be best explained without any nuance or shades of grey ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • kayjay@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            His reasoning was if the US didn’t make it, the Nazis would, and that would be even worse. He never wanted to make the bomb, it was just the lesser of two evils.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t use a weapon on a nation, you can only use a weapon on a nation’s population.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Look up most of the contemporary US pacific command saying the bombings were unnecessary. I know Asian people are just ants to people like you but Jesus, the pathetic rationalizations.

              • TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ants is a pretty apt comparison to Japanese culture at the time. All expected to become soldiers and die for the hive. Seriously, shit was crazy. They were not going to surrender otherwise.

                Firebombings were daily killing more than the bombs did as well.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ants is a pretty apt comparison to Japanese culture at the time.

                  Okay, thank you for proving my point and admitting you’re a virulent racist so publicly.

                  • TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I mean… That’s what the culture was at the time. No need to name call over it. It is well documented and any attempt to obfuscate it is revisionism.

                    Our discussion is prompting me to look more into the history here, though. Your comment on modern generals’ statements is intriguing. That lead me to learn about Soviet entry into the war, defeating Japan in Manchuria, which may have promoted talk of surrender among Japanese leadership.

                    I’ll certainly keep researching and I’m open to changing my view. Feel free to present me with some material to consider rather than calling me racist.

    • RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Americans in general hate to acknowledge the war crimes they commit. I think it was more about a business decision than anything else.

      • Burnt@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Show me a culture that likes to recognize the war crimes they commited as war crimes.

        The Japanese seem to do way more of sweeping their dirty laundry under the rug from WWII under the rug than Americans.

        And no, that’s not trying to excuse Americans of acknowledging their own war crimes. Every culture should own their past and do their best to learn from their mistakes.

        • Waldhuette@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Germany/Germans have absolutely no issue with recognizing our war crimes. I doubt anyone comes as close in terms to acknowledging their dark history.