• 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We need higher density zoning, and better public transport.

    Hubs of high density housing joined by good public transport is, IMO, the answer.

    Urban sprawl certainly isn’t it. And these housing estates where they cram 30 houses on an acre is rubbish. All the negatives is single home ownership without any of the positives.

    Also: why the hell doesn’t government have more trades on the books? QBuild could be so much more than it is.

    • TheHolm@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      All we need is to force businesses out of the cities. IT will solve transport problem big time. There is no need for cities anymore.

      • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Three reasons why cities/‘large conglomerations of people and technology’ remain necessary,

        Communications infrastructure still has large costs. Decentralisation is good, but the costs do increase, there is a balance point between the extremes. Lemmy and the wider fediverse is a great example of a search for that balance point.

        Network effects, alone with my own thoughts i’m a scrub with a mug, together with others help those thoughts can become gems.

        Company towns, an extreme but possible outcome, are a bad idea. It is a monopoly using geography and societal connections to reduce the competitiveness of your employee base.