Yeah I assumed the same thing before reading the article.

I believe people have done similar things to unprotected artwork. I think I remember that happened here in the US at some point in recent years.

Just to be clear, I was saying from the beginning that I don’t really see the harm in this because the painting was protected by glass.

My point in bringing that up was just to argue that people being outraged by this are unjustified in my opinion, as there was no damage done to the painting.

I was acknowledging that outrage would be justified if it were to actually cause damage; I wasn’t insinuating that climate protesters were notorious for damaging artwork.