What’s Debian based on again? I think it was some earlier variant of Ubuntu

/s

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yep, Debian was (is) a disaster to configure graphics with modern hardware.

    Hasn’t been the case for years. Perhaps even a decade, from what I recall. Just check the “nonfree” option in the installer, and you’ll get all the drivers you need. It’s not any harder to set up than Ubuntu these days.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ubuntu has been around for 2 decades (close nough, octobet it’s 2 decades) and yes, Debian is 11 year older and now known for it’s desktop friendly use. That Debian caught up in the last decade is about time, but to late for the major population who want linux but not the hassle of manually configure the graphics environment.

      To be honest, I see that most people of 30 and younger don’t know or care how a computer (or anything) works, it just works.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then they don’t need to use Debian. There are plenty of user friendly options. Debians installer is kind of bad but that doesn’t mean Debian is bad.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You can’t disable root and tasksel may be confusing to some.

            • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why would you want to disable root?

              Remote root login is disabled by default, local root disabeling is useless anyway, as when you have acdess to the physical system you can break it open anyway.

              • Possibly linux
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because sudo exists and is way better for so many reasons.

                • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s a better way, but not fool proof. I always keep root available for console login. (Saves booting from external media when there is an issue) For the rest, sudo is perfect though, but it doesn’t replace root login in 100% of the situations.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          What is bad about it? It’s as fool proof as the RedHat installer, unless you go to the expert text mode one. (And even that is pretty straight forward)