• Philo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You could just watch what you input into it lol ChatGPT is a pretty good tool to have in the toolkit and like any tool there’s warnings and cautions on its use.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s an amazing tool. I think it’s funny how many people fight it tooth and nail. I like to think they’re the kind of person who refused to use spell check, or the touch tone phone.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are very valid philosophical and ethical reasons not to use it. We’re not just being luddites for the hell of it. In many cases, we’re engineers and scientists with interest, experience, or expertise in neural nets and LLMs ourselves, and we don’t like how fast and loose (in a lot of really, really important ways) all these big companies are playing it with the training datasets, nor how they’re actively disregarding any sort of legal or ethical responsibility around the technology writ large.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            Likewise. The same could be said about every technology.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Uh, no. Why would that be the case? Every technology has unique upsides and downsides and the downsides of this one are not being handled correctly and are in fact being exacerbated.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not against chat GPT or other AI, but I am thoroughly sick of hearing about it.

      • JustUseMint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Absolutely. Host your own. Like the other person said, Hugging Face and look upon llama.cpp as well, vicuna wizard uncensored probably spelled that wrong

      • BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I finally found some offline ones jan.ai and koboldcpp you download the GGUF model and run everything from your own pc, it just takes a lot of CPU and GPU for it to work acceptable, my setup can’t really manage much more than a model with 7B.

    • zeluko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, they are talking about the OpenAI end user version, not the models themselves.
      Its still sketchy to send your data willingly to them and hope because you pay per request, its not getting tracked and saved.
      My company is deep into microsoft, so we all get Bing Chat Enterprise.
      Microsoft says it doesnt store anything and runs on separate systems… i guess with a company-offer they are more likely to put more protections in place because a breach would mean real consequences.
      (opposed to a breach with end-users, most of which dont care or would ever go through the legal trouble)