• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      10 months ago

      universities take plagiarism very seriously. Friend of mine teaches stage craft (how to make sets, props, costumes, lighting and sound design/planning/execution/engineering)

      First semester, first test, easy pass: Someone pokes their head into the class and my friend goes to the door to answer them, stepping outside for like ~30 seconds

      comes to mark the papers:

      “In a proscenium theater, what is the very front of the stage called?”

      Real answer: apron

      55% of the student answers: the same made up word that sounded vaguely Portuguese with no hits on Google.

      even though it’s super dumb and super easy and barely matters at all and is a one word answer to a basic question - the students ended up being investigated by the university and my friend had all his classes audited.

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just wanna say I took a stage craft class as an elective many, many years ago when college was affordable enough to do such things.

        We didn’t do anything hands on, just learned how stuff works.

        It was one of my most favorite classes. I was a beer chugging, skirt chasing, never went to class burnout back then, but I enthusiastically went to that class every time.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I may be dumb, but to clarify: they were assumed cheating because the word was fake, and the only reason for so many duplicated fake answers would be if they shared a faulty answer sheet. Right?

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          yeah, I mean a forgivable wrong answer would be “downstage center” “the front” “the lip” “limelights” “footlights” “wing” “leg” “curtain” “pit” - like close but wrong terminology or similar guesses.

          The fact that loads of them said the same weird wrong answer was very sus.

      • Senshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Still, cheating to some extent exists everywhere. This just weeds out the real lazy or stupid cheaters. Which is also some kind of quality check, I guess.

        To cheat properly, I’ve has to be a bit clever and shrewd, which is a valuable character trait. Maybe not the most moral one, but real life isn’t all moral either. 🤷‍♂️

        Sometimes the best and most efficient solutions are created by just cleverly combining the work of others.

        • I will say up front that I am not a cheater - not because of good moral character, but because I am a terrible liar. It’s less stressful to me to risk failure, than to risk being caught.

          That said, a lot of cheating is excellent preparation for work in corporate America. I don’t like that it is, but it is. My main beef with capitalism is that it encourages, breeds, and rewards the absolute worst attributes of human nature. There’s literally nothing in capitalism that speaks to anything good in people. Knowing how to cheat, cheat profitably, and (most importantly) avoid being caught is perhaps one of the most useful skills in the American capitalist corporate space.

          • Senshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not getting caught is less important than always having a scapegoat ready. A successful office worker is just like a politician: talk a lot, confuse the issue as much as possible, and in an emergency, deflect blame on someone else. The actual work delivered matters very little, and ideally you can just appropriate the work of someone less well spoken anyway.

            Your bosses will praise you for your open communications and dealing well with trouble.

            And this is a global truth, not just in the US. I have encountered many a successful worker that contributes nothing to their company or society. And while more noticable at boss and manager levels, this goes all the way down to minimum wage line work, although there it’s more difficult to hide.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Doesn’t mean it has to be tolerated.

          If a school is known to go easy on cheaters. Why would anyone actually trust a degree from that school?

          You don’t learn by just copying someone’s github repository and presenting it as your solution.

          As someone said. “You copied that function without understanding why it does what it does, and as a result your code IS GARBAGE. AGAIN.”

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a masters program, I have no issue with high level cheaters getting slapped with consequences. When I was in undergrad, first offence was an immediate F in the class, with a second being expulsion. Given the requirements for masters/doctorate (my MIL got both while I was dating my wife), getting an F is probably going to bounce you from the program anyway, so it’s not that much difference IMO.

    • finestnothing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s more that it’s in their master’s capstone class. In undergrad, definitely too harsh. But for a master’s program I get it

    • firewood010
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I hope my Uni had this. I have never cheated, but cheaters sometimes have better grades than me.

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guess that would harm you if the class is graded on a curve. I’m not saying they shouldn’t be caught and penalized, only that expulsion from the university is a harsh penalty. Automatic failure of the class would hurt plenty, without utterly destroying someone’s life.

        • firewood010
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It is not harsh. Cheating is immoral and unfair, and every adult knows that. It is in nature a forgery of your degree. Honesty needs to be highly valued and respected. We have cooperations and politicians lying everyday because of this.