stoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTwitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1176arrow-down1external-linkTwitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comstoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarejtk@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDo blue checks not see ads? I agree, when a service is subscription/donation only, it’s way better. But if any part of the business model is ad based, it’s shit, and paying to hide them won’t make it any better.
minus-squareBappity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agothey see “half” ads >_> no joke
minus-squaresnor10@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoImagine paying and still seeing ads… smh
Do blue checks not see ads? I agree, when a service is subscription/donation only, it’s way better. But if any part of the business model is ad based, it’s shit, and paying to hide them won’t make it any better.
they see “half” ads >_>
no joke
Imagine paying and still seeing ads… smh