PugJesus@kbin.social to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world · 11 months agoThe furries are doing their part o7media.kbin.socialimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down15
arrow-up1114arrow-down1imageThe furries are doing their part o7media.kbin.socialPugJesus@kbin.social to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down7·11 months ago the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag I mean, no. It’s really not. I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down5·11 months agoI agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.
minus-squareBaroqueInMind@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down9·11 months agoThey do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.
minus-squareyuriy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·11 months agoexcept they don’t though, where are you coming up with this? say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens? some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?
I mean, no. It’s really not.
I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.
I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.
They do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.
except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?
say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?
some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?