The judge agreed with the tech industry trade group NetChoice that the law violated minors’ free speech rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment.
The judge’s arguments in this case are bogus - minors don’t have any free speech rights, or e.g. public schools wouldn’t be the free speech free zones that they are - but your argument is much, much worse, because it hurts adults and minors. You want to see where your argument leads, go look at the state of porn in Louisiana.
The judge’s arguments in this case are bogus - minors don’t have any free speech rights, or e.g. public schools wouldn’t be the free speech free zones that they are - but your argument is much, much worse, because it hurts adults and minors. You want to see where your argument leads, go look at the state of porn in Louisiana.