• mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But this is what happens. Every rush hour the roads are packed with cars, mostly just with one person in them, while the trains are actually full.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      During rush hour you definitely won’t have a distance of 10 meters between each car though.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they’re moving there should be, and if not it doesn’t seem fair to me to compare transport to a car park.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the cars are moving at over 5m/s then there will be for minimum safe followong distance.

        If they are moving under that, you don’t have a transport system that is more capable than a brisk walk.

        • icedcoffee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re making good points and all but I keep reading your username as SchrodingerShat

        • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          5 m/s is 18kph or ~11mph.

          40kph safe stopping distance is 26 meters dry, 30 meters wet. I can’t even find data below 40 kph, but 10m would be reaction time alone (no bake time)

      • pkulak@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but only because they aren’t moving. It should be about the distance traveled in a couple seconds. Less then that and you get a lot of wrecks, so brand new problems.