![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/ed7bd7d8-a25a-496b-8c3c-3715ec09b129.png)
You’re definitely better at picking colors than the chart illustrator.
You’re definitely better at picking colors than the chart illustrator.
Same. I didn’t technically qualify at the time, but I had a kid hospitalized when I was about 4000 miles from home with no car, no phone, and no immediate contacts. They hooked me up with a room outside the hospital and just asked for a donation if I wanted and to keep it tidy.
I’m going to report this guide to the department of redundancy department.
Did I sub to Quackery guides by accident?
So, in your opinion, did anything in the universe verifiably happened until after 1857?
On a related note, Trump attempted to set the refugee cap to Zero. Both sides are about as similar as milk and a tire.
con·vic·tion
noun
a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.
“she had a previous conviction for a similar offense”
“America needs to do whatever Israel needs and stop telling them how to fight this war. You are either a friend or not a friend.”
She reminds me of an alcoholic friend I had in college. Telling you to stop doesn’t mean I hate you. It means you’re making bad decisions.
My friend got her doctorate engineering rice to grow in high salinity areas. The goal was to aid farmers near brackish water and without access to good farmland. Greenpeace would definitely not like that.
I spent about a decade working with refugees and had the same experience with Pakistani people. It felt like I was in bizarro world. They’re waiting 10+ years to get to the US, and during that time Trump basically tries to ban refugee entries altogether, and they’re still like, nope Trump’s a great guy. I don’t understand the world I guess.
Seeing that it’s been explicitly stated that that’s not the case, you strike me as a dude that cares less about the meaning of words than the opportunity to argue about them.
If you read the law you posted, it doesn’t actually address the question of victimhood. Also, I don’t really get why you’re still trying to force an unrelated point into this part of the discussion. Maybe find another place in the thread where someone thinks it’s legal and go talk to them.
While true, it also wasn’t really what my post was responding to. Thanks though.
Having never used an AI generator, generic generated images wouldn’t be an actual match to the dataset images, right? It would just be generating features it understands to be associated with the concept of a child, which would make the claim that the dataset children are the abuse targets a stretch, unless there’s some other direct or indirect harm to them. An immediate exception being a person writing a prompt attempting to create a specific facsimile of an individual.
Thank you for putting the correct quote.
“Hotdog car isn’t science fiction, it’s science fact.”
~Oscar Meyer, probably
Coach Z has had it rough since the sun set on the golden age of flash animation.
It’s like he went to the Carlson school of ‘just asking questions’.
Food misdemeanor.
I too am more concerned about other topics than Russia snooping my PC.