Buglefingers

As the other commenter said, it would probably be for post-workout. Chocolate milk has fats, proteins, sugar, and a variety of micro nutrients. As far as I’m aware sugar is actually pretty important in liquid recovery drinks because it encourages the cells to absorb the sugar which allows other things to also join the fray. Fats and proteins also have numerous positive affects on muscle gain which I think is broadly known to some degree. IIRC this is the reason Gatorade and like drinks have the amount of sugar they do (plus palatability).

This is not a statement of fact and should be verified by primary sources*

It looks correct to me, the inside view doesn’t even clear the window, the outside view shows that the wall is maybe ~1’ past the window frame which we don’t even see on the inside shot. Unless I’m missing something?

I don’t see a gauge control sticker. How do we know it meets GD&T standards?

This makes it a Banana for scale (for reference) lmao

This is bad humor based off of my industry

More of a “To whom it may concern” lol

Q

Create gov science centers for each major branch of science, provide funding. Allow them to delegate within their narrower and narrower fields with loose requirements such as x-y% is salary a-b% is resources, and maybe something like each new study can get no less than $z and no More than $r.

I’m not saying this is perfect but spending more money towards it in general and allowing some branch delegation of funding would hopefully at least resolve the grant writing part and ensure salary. Though I’m not sure how one would ensure that they are being productive and not doing frivolous things on purpose. Perhaps q amount of hours a year must go to a gov decided research project and the rest is up to the researcher.

Maybe funding for a project is aquired through hours contributed to projects the gov deems with a standard for high social benefit? I.E. You help with the research on this new hydro electric tech (regardless of outcome because we feel it’s an important study topic) and we pay ($p per hour spent on hydro tech) towards a study of your choice.

I’ve been thinking about tryna help out by posting memes, but all the ones I have are gonna be reposts, albeit from reddit, potentially years ago now. If ppl are interested I know for sure I at least got over 1k saved on my computer

But it feels like trivial pursuits

Oh absolutely, legs, arms, and head are still full of messy stuff though.

Mine has a double triangle, I am the triforce

Though I’d suspect you do want it in the deep freezer for some period of time, it makes the whole “blood and innards” thing much less of an issue to deal with I’d think. At least for chopping and/or bagging

Your question “Is this true to some extent” (that oaks will die off from root damage)

Second part: “Yes but the implication here is that oaks are in particular much more susceptible to damage from roots than other trees.”

My answers: “Oaks are way more susceptible to pests and diseases, because of this 1/3 are near extinction and another 1/3 is under preservation consideration.” and “Roots are the life blood of a tree, damage to that makes them particularly vulnerable” (paraphrasing)

To absolutely and clearly answer your question using the answers I have already provided: Yes, Oaks are more likely to die from minor damage to the roots than other trees because they are a lot more susceptible to pests and diseases. So vunerable in fact that 2/3rds of all species are at least in consideration for conservation. So minor damage to the roots is, again, much more likely to be fatal to an oak versus other trees.

If that does not explicitly answer your above questions than I do not think it’s possible to answer your questions with the way you’ve provided them.

“An estimated 31% of the world’s oak species are threatened with extinction, while 41% of oak species are considered to be of conservation concern.” From the link I provided, under conservation tab.

Also in that link I provided it states that Oaks are susceptible to a large number of pests and diseases.

So I think that belies that oaks, being more susceptible to more pests and diseases, are way more likely to die from an injury to the roots than other trees. Which may explain the extinction threat and conservation concern status

1: Nobody would notice regardless

2: That’ll happen even without you

3: :'(

How about a potato giving managerial instructions to a newt

It’s also possible he didn’t like being touched. I’m also someone who’s particular about touch, sometimes people take offense to not wanting hugs etc.

Seems like he didn’t know them so he may not have wanted to be touched like that and had not-so-tactfully told them so.

Ahhhh okay, didn’t see that there

First: Yuck

Second: How would I eat that? No.

Dogs require a lot more attention and general effort than cats typically. So it would make sense that the pet of choice is predominantly the one that can more or less be self sufficient if you provide it with the basics.

Roots are more or less the life blood of a tree, and while small damage by itself won’t kill it (to my knowledge) it opens it up way more severely to pests and “infection”, promptly killing the plant.

*I’m not a botanist, this is an answer based off of my “common knowledge”.

Please use this for better sources or salted information: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak