you dip the chicken nuggets in whiskey and then roll them in cocaine for a nice speedy schnitzel
you dip the chicken nuggets in whiskey and then roll them in cocaine for a nice speedy schnitzel
I think it’s called tonk tink
I doubt any modern movie could come anywhere close to its brilliance. There’s too much Hollywood bureaucracy garbage dictating what will get made and what not. People like Weinstein destroying movies for personal gain or just because they can. And just garbage industry practices overall.
it’s so cringe that dancing has become so cringe that people can’t even imagine people could dance without drugs
kindly ask them to boof the meth instead
chad asians respecting their ancestors so much they even build them cities /s
http://github.com/matrix-org/dma-demo-app-bridge-whatsapp
This is one thing I’ve found on their github so far, but it seems inactive.
There is a fork that element seem to have forked back:
http://github.com/element-hq/mautrix-whatsapp
from
interesting thanks, that’s cool to hear. Sad that there’s no effort to move to a standard protocol, but understandable.
Probably because beehaw aggressively defederates from any annoying instances.
I would say Lemmy and the lemmy apps are currently set up to funnel as many users into any communities as possible, because there are so little people on here.
I usually browse rising (of all communties I haven’t blocked) so there is enough content. I imagine many people are doing the same.
The only fixes I see is when 1) Lemmy gets more users, 2) defederating aggressively or 3) heavy moderation or 4) having “high effort” barriers to posting in communities (for example: must have X much karma or write a message to the mods to post).
All my experiences on the privacy communties were that 10x more people from outside comment and are angry that I want more privacy. Which kind of defeats the point of communties. At the moment communities act more like topic tags that categorize posts, not as real communities.
Lemmy is pretty good for what it is, but it needs many changes to survive into the future, to operate more like how it was intended.
why would we be able to? are the any plans to open them up?
let’s just ban them and make have a mechanism in place to avoid another switcheroo to another “not yet proven harmful” class of chemicals. I’m sure they’ll come up with something better eventually. I don’t want to have to shop around endlessly to not wear poison.
Those are way more interesting than this single installation with -0.66%:
“Another more recent study carried out by the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) on 1,700 American sites totaling 7.2 GW of power, showed a median degradation of around -0.75%/year. Moveover, another research focused on 4,300 residential installations in operation in Europe and used different data processing methodologies. Depending on the methods, a median loss of -0.36% to -0.67%/year was obtained.”
Also the article doesn’t mention standard deviation or IQR of the drop, or what efficiency they originally had. Which is the minimum of information I would expect.
it’s people from other communities who don’t give a shit about any of this and are irrationally angry about anything AI. even if you could use it to diagnose cancer 10x more accurately, they would hate it.
That’s the point of the repuation system.
It’s a very hard problem, I’ll give you that.
What you need is, each instance and community collects reputation in the federation. then users posting on those instances can collect reputation on those. basically by not being banned or massively downvoted. Your reputation is weighted by the reputation of each you collected it from instance.
Each users identity is tied to some key that collects reputation, that you generate new identities from from for each instance/community/post. Like how some credit card services give you a new credit card number for each new website.
Admins don’t know who you are, but they can see and verify your reputation.
Then instance/community admins can decide if they want a different weighting. For example, to completely disregard the reputation by some instance or make one you like 10x more important.
You could get an ordered list of posts or pseudonymous users based on the reputation. Untrustworthy users will glow like a christmas tree.
That would be one way to do it. It’s hard to make it water tight, but any improvements would be better than the current fediworse.
It doesn’t have to be.
You could keep the general structure and functioning while improving privacy.
For example, by obfuscating post history, anonymous posting or assigning a user pseudonym per instance/community, auto-deleting old posts/comments. All optional features of course. Let instances/communites decide which of these features they want.
Keep the structure of Lemmy with it’s Reddit-like-ness and instances, but give users, instances and communities more control over data privacy.
Sure it’s harder to implement, you need some minimal-knowledge reputation system, but there is nothing fundamental preventing that from being possible.
The nice thing about federation is that one instance/community can stay the same data-leaking privacy mess, if they so prefer. While others could operate analogous to 4-chan (or anything in between).
I would love to have a switch to turn off the autism at will, if that actually worked and had no side effects.
But that seems like an impossibity in this current pharma system.
Patents absolutely destroyed the incentive to sell the best drugs, instead the incentive is to sell dangerous drugs that can be patented and maximally milked for money.
from what I’ve seen, the essence of this show is 1) be edgy 2) be maximally whacky
emphasis on best