• 7 Posts
  • 502 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle



  • Them being adversarial doesn’t really matter. The allies of today are the enemies of tomorrow and the converse, so the who shouldn’t matter. The problem is with anyone collecting data on your citizens because it can be sold, traded, stolen, or abused.

    If it was about protecting people, a wide-spread countermeasure would be used instead of a pinpointed assault targeting a single app.






  • Godnroc@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone"No"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I feel like that’s the only justification I’ve ever really heard, but I find it to be rather flimsy. It assumes that someone willing to assault someone else would be deterred by a sign. It also assumes that assaults only happen across genders and not within, which is either very narrow-minded or willfully obstinate.

    Personally, I would think individual unisex bathrooms that each contain their own sink would be the safest option. You enter fully aware and lock the door behind yourself, only leaving once you are fully aware and alert again. Given that the common area between stalls is essentially public, you could have cameras observing the entrance without invading privacy and capturing anyone attempting to force their way in or tailgate someone entering a stall. Better, safer, gender neutral.