Legally, maybe. But who’s going to stop him? Both houses of congress are controlled by Repugnicans.

I think what pisses me off the most is the casual carelessness with which they’re doing this. Like, I’m definitely mad about the stuff they’re actually trying to delete. But they’ve cast such a wide, stupid net that they’re also deleting a ton of stuff they didn’t even intend to, and clearly nobody is vetting any of it. It’s just so senseless.

Our cat likes to wait for us to get out of the shower, then she tries to catch the drops running down the inside of the glass door.

A lot of the mass produced beer brands are made with a mix of barley malt and rice. And while other low-alcoholic beverages have traditionally been made with a malt base, many of them (especially alcoholic seltzers) are just fermenting cane sugar syrup these days because it’s cheaper and has less flavor to cover up.

Implementing some fuzzy logic algorithms?

Anya (she and all of her litter mates were named for Buffy TVS characters): frequently referred to as Fluffy Girl, Hissy Face, or Lady Shedsalot

Ozymandias (named for one of my favorite poems, but also to kind of keep with the Buffy theme): Oz, Ozzy, Bubby, Fuzzy Boy, Big Boy, Squeaky, Fluff For Brains

They’ve already been firing generals that won’t toe the line. They’re in the process of ridding the military of trans soldiers. Gay/Lesbian soldiers will probably be next, and I don’t doubt there will soon be incentives to rat out any fellow soldiers who are suspected of not being “Loyal Americans”.

Speaking as a US citizen, I’m terrified of the rhetoric the leaders of my country are spewing right now. It feels like a preamble to open war against multiple peaceful allies. He has surrounded himself with sycophants that are urging him on. Hopefully your government is meeting with other world leaders and making appropriate plans. This shit is crazy.

That said, I dislike the idea of healthcare being able to pick and choose, for any reason, not to treat someone.

This is exactly the problem. Once you start talking about who does and does not deserve healthcare, you’ve gone to a place I refuse to follow. There is far too much nuance to start drawing lines in the sand.

So basically: “comply willingly with our executive decree or we will fuck all your shit up.”

No. For multiple reasons:

• Vaccines are not 100% effective. They reduce the likelihood of infection if you are exposed. The whole point of trying to get everyone vaccinated is to reduce the infection rate so that there’s less likely to be an outbreak. With a vaccinated population, the virus can’t spread fast enough to maintain a pool of infected people to keep spreading it. But that doesn’t mean nobody gets sick.
• Vaccines are not as effective on some people. There’s a range of effectiveness.
• Not everyone can get vaccinated. People with certain allergies or compromised immune systems in particular.
• Some parts of the population have higher risk factors than others and when they get sick it can be much more serious. Usually the very old and the very young. And again, people with compromised immune systems, or other conditions that complicate the illness.
• Kids whose parents refuse to get them vaccinated are put at elevated risk through no fault of their own.

I could probably keep going, but hopefully you get the idea why that’s just not a viable approach.

The United States v Trump ruling was that a president can not be held criminally liable for their exercise of the powers of the presidency.

But they left it wide open for interpretation of exactly what it means to exercise the powers of the presidency, which was the whole point of the case. No reasonable interpretation would include “encouraging an angry mob to storm the capitol building” but here we are.

Courts can still rule that a president’s actions are illegal and order injunctions, or even find contempt if court orders are not followed. This has already happened several times in the last month.

And when I see someone successfully enforce one of those injunctions, court orders, or contempt charges, and it stands against appeal, I will happily agree that the justice system has not been completely kneecapped.

I really do hope you’re right and I’m blowing this out of proportion. I’m just not seeing the light at the end of the tunnel right now.

It wouldn’t matter. The Supremes decreed that he can do whatever the fuck he wants so long as an argument can be made that it was related to his duties as president. Constitutional limitations on the office of president mean nothing anymore until that decision is overturned.

The billionaire bureaucrat has claimed this defense to his organization’s cost-cutting measures before, saying that DOGE simply makes recommendations for cuts to agency heads, and then it’s up to those heads to execute them.

“It’s not MY fault they did what I told them to do!”

True. They have a high pitched squeak that sounds more like a gull.

We should have gone with the turkey.

My list of endorphin-boosting games:

Dorfromantik
Unpacking
A Little To The Left
Tiny Glade - though this one barely qualifies as a game

If you want something a little more gamified: Balatro is amazing and addictive.

Your catpuccino is ready.

Many other GOP leaders have adopted a similar tack, asserting that the protests Republican lawmakers have encountered have been concocted by Democrats and do not reflect genuine voter anger over the Trump cuts.

Oh, I see. Democrats. Not genuine voters.

McMullen’s personal conduct was unrelated to the business, but was found to be inconsistent with its business ethics policy.

So it’s business ethics related. My guess: bribing someone or engaging in blatant talks about anti-competitive behavior. The merger with Albertsons was just recently killed, so it might be related to that. Nothing that rises to the level of outright illegal, because he didn’t actually act on it (didn’t get a chance?). But it definitely creates a problem for the company.

“…First State to Repeal Civil Rights Protections for Any Protected Class”

FIFY.