• 11 Posts
  • 2.23K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 16th, 2024

help-circle
  • This is what we have before the government invests $500 billion USD into AI surveillance research, imagine what we’ll have after!

    I mean, aside from a shit ton of new H-1B hires.

    (To be clear, I have nothing against the hires themselves, but the fraud and deception used to skip past qualified domestic labor. The money earned by visa holders being spent overseas is also concerning since that money loses any velocity it has within the American economy).






  • I’d be very supportive of a public, public key infrastructure and Identity Provider.

    They should eventually be necessary for some things…like any official government or online banking business. Essentially anywhere you would expect something to be notarized or witnessed.

    But they should be optionally allowed on other services. I wouldn’t accept requiring an official government ID to shitpost on Reddit, but if I were a celebrity and I could use it to officially verify myself on Mastodon, or even Facebook? Sure.

    People misunderstand what client certificates are and what they do. They are a pair of keys, private and public. You use the private key to digitally sign (and/or encrypt) a message. The public key (client certificate) is issued by a third-party entity that all involved parties trust (the certificate authority), as proof that it has received a message signed by the same private key in the past.

    By storing the private keys on something portable but non-exportable, like a smartcard, they are the “something you have” in multifactor authentication. And by virtue of needing to be protected by a password/pin/passphrase, proof of “something you know”.

    It’s the digital equivalent of a state issued ID or driver’s license, and personally I think it’s absurd we don’t have it by now. You technically don’t “need” a state-issued ID to do anything, but they also certainly make modern life a hell of a lot easier.


  • JasonDJtoFlippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comLegality
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Abolitionists were a growing minority. Lincoln didn’t just wake up one day and free the slaves…but we are still 18 years away from the 200 year anniversary of the emancipation proclamation.

    But society (US society) as a whole accepted slavery as a fact of life.

    Just like we accept suicide nets, sweat factories, “inmate labor”, ,Uighur camps, and North Korean “mercenaries” as facts of life today. We don’t want them, we just choose to forget they exist. Through our collective inaction, we passively condone them.

    Plenty of individuals oppose them enough to actively avoid supporting them in any way, but they are such an inconsiderable minority of consumers, in the eyes of the corporate lords.


  • JasonDJtoFlippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comLegality
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ethics: refer to a set of principles and guidelines that are established by a community, organization, or society to promote responsible and respectful behavior.

    Law reflects the ethics of the populace, not the other way around.

    “Ethical” is a social construct that’s time-bound based upon the beliefs and actions of the people.

    Slavery was ethical, for the population of slavers. The holocaust was ethical, based upon the beliefs of Nazis.

    “Ethics” isn’t a guideline, it’s a benchmark.

    History is written by the winners and we are all a product of our environment, including our time. If we were born 200 years ago in the US South, we’d be perfectly fine with slavery.

    That doesn’t make it right, we have a different perspective here in the present, where we understand (or at least understood) basic human rights, and that black people are, indeed, human.




  • JasonDJtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldnobody mistakenly does a nazi salut
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t disagree, but I do think that the deliberate part is to get everybody talking about Elon while Trump goes through and destroys America unchecked.

    They know we’ve got the attention span of goldfish, and they know we’re much more apt to focus on a controversial person doing naughty things.

    These people literally control the narrative. Everything is deliberate and malicious.


  • Can we chill with the Nazi salute guys?

    Like, I get it, Musk is a Nazi shitbag. Not much of a surprise there.

    But I’ve seen like 100 posts about the damn salute and like 2 about the flood of EOs that Trump has put out the last two days.

    Starting to wonder if the salute was an intentional distraction. Because of course the Internet would be on fire about that.