• 0 Posts
  • 333 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle







  • Nelots@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldPter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I think the intended idea was that she freezes mid-sentence in shock after fully comprehending what was said. Shrunken iris, mouth half open… I personally think the reaction makes sense.




  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I still don’t see any reason to believe in things I don’t see any evidence for. If you want to believe in ghosts or spirituality or Bigfoot or whatever, have at it. I don’t agree with you, but I don’t really care either. I only take issue with people that have, and act according to, beliefs that cause direct harm to others. Religions, crystal healing, antivaxxers, etc.

    Sure, a community based around not believing in flying pigs might not make sense to you. Why build a community around not believing something? But you’re missing the same point a lot of religious folk do when they say, “why do you hate god if you don’t believe in him?” See, what if you lived in a world where 90% of people believed in either flying pigs, flying sheep, or flying cows, and all around the world, people in power are making laws based around these things that directly hurt, suppress, and ostracize the lives of others? Suddenly, making a community around it makes more sense.

    What do we get out of it? Well, we get a sense of community and belonging for one thing. We all have something in common, and many of us have even been directly hurt or oppressed by the beliefs we stand against. And besides, we’re not perfect human beings—sometimes it’s just fun to poke fun at things we find ridiculous with a group of like-minded individuals.



  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I mean, I agree completely. I’m an agnostic atheist myself. I believe it is highly unlikely a god exists, but outright claiming absolutely no gods exist is a positive claim that also requires evidence if you wish to convince others. It’s not a stance I’m willing to take.

    That said, I’m very willing to make the positive claim that certain gods do not exist. The christian god, for example, at least as described in the bible, is so logically inconsistent that I am willing to take a hard atheist stance on its existence and say outright I believe it does not exist.


  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    when science doesn’t have an explanation or evidence either

    The difference is that we’re willing to admit we don’t know, while the religious think they do. We don’t have a burden of proof here because we’re not claiming anything.

    A true scientist would acknowledge that there is possibility of interference-based creation based on our current understanding of physics.

    Most people do acknowledge that its possible. Its just very, very, very, (…) unlikely to be the case. Everything else we’ve ever proven to be true has been caused by natural causes. Why should it suddenly be different? I’m open to being proven wrong when the time comes, but in the meantime I will continue to ignore wild ideas that contradict everything we know and are brought forth without any evidence. That’s not arrogance.


  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I currently live in a society where trans and gay rights are constantly under attack by religious folk simply because a ‘holy book’ supposedly says they’re sinners (despite it never mentioning trans people). Forgive me for not feeling sorry for the religious.

    Besides, you’re in an atheist community. What do you expect us to talk about?


  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I never said we couldn’t. But even if we found the cause of the existence of everything (assuming there was one), and it wasn’t god, its still impossible to rule out that God just set all of that into motion. The likelihood gets smaller and smaller, and god’s influence gets smaller and smaller, but its physically impossible to actually disprove it. There will always be a smaller hole for a creator-being to crawl into. Which is why “nobody has disproved god” is a meaningless sentence.


  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    You’ll find God there, scientifically or not.

    I mean, feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but it sure seems like you believe a god exists when you say something like that, no?

    As for the rest of what you said… that’s irrelevant. The problem is that it could be (and IMO is) physically impossible for literally nothing to exist. We simply don’t know, as we don’t know what came before or caused the big bang. The concept of nothingness is a whole complicated philosophical debate. Saying “erm, things exists, therefore god” makes no sense.

    Besides, god is ‘something’. You have the same problem regardless.



  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    It is, quite literally, physically impossible to completely disprove that a god exists. Just like it’s physically impossible to disprove that space outside of the observable universe is actually made up of infinite tiny rainbow unicorns.

    How would you disprove something you can’t interact with?


  • Nelots@lemm.eetoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Nobody thinks our current understanding is perfect. But, just because we don’t know everything, doesn’t mean we need to entertain wild ideas without a lick of evidence. Sure, there could be supernatural explanations for things. But any other time we’ve previously thought something was caused by the supernatural, it was proven to not be. Every. Single. Time. Why bet on the horse that’s lost 1,000 races?