Or the liberals will join up with him and they’ll just make sure no one hurts the corporations they were paid by.

Wrong? No. But I would warn, as a fellow Canadian myself, that it didn’t totally fix the problem.

Pierre Polievre (current right wing leader who walked with the Trucker convoy) is probably going to win at least a minority, and the more right wing parts of my family can’t hide their hope he “finally helps the majority, rather then all these minorities getting help.”

I had an uncle who nearly tested this theory.

I hope he gets his license pulled soon.

The closest I could think about was Economists speaking out about Reaganomics. I also couldn’t find anything exactly like this, however I did find Bush Sr. Calling it voodoo economics and Democrats actually are credited in some cases as calling it Trickle Down economics as a negative. Even Gerald Ford attacked it, which is something coming from the guy who pardoned Nixon.

I found some criticism from Martin Feldstein in 1986 about the strength of supply side economics and some “extremists”, though that was after the fact.

But then you can’t fire them and not have to call it a re org.

It’s nice, but it comes with micromanagement. They are like fleas, though the biting is more painful.

It’s a setup for them saying you may identify as Trans, then switching it up by explaining some news for you, as in something said in the news, aka a storm coming

I am remembering an article months ago that stated Toronto businesses were having trouble employing people due to cost of living driving up wages.

So while I’d hope we could argue for the above, I don’t think the top earners want to give up anything. Or rather they (the top earners) realize this, know a return to work will kick off people quitting for company’s that are remote, and have told Chow that she has to deal with the consequences, aka finding a way to travel the city better than currently and food prices to calm down or for rent prices to drop.

And asking them to fund better methods for getting downtown, right? Or subsidizing food costs so restaurants don’t cost a lot, right? Or not working employees to death so they don’t mind staying downtown every so often, right?

No, no, gotta make employees come downtown, that’ll solve it. What little I could read, the banks are asking her to lead the way. So now it’s up to Queens Park to improve the city, which the province will not fund, which will mean half measures and shitty work for the rest of us. Great job Olivia, try harder.

Yes, nuance matters quite a bit. Saying “man, I wish America was like the 50s” is fine if I believe all people should have a living wage and one person should be able to support a family on their wage. It’s another thing if I feel that minorities have too many rights now.

I think it comes down to what those things are rather then not compromising. Not compromising on human rights, for instance, is great. Not compromising on if you can openly hate gay people due to your religion, not so great. If you feel child labour is required for a functional society, also not great. So it’s chilling when someone in a high level of rule making says they don’t believe they can compromise on their hatred.

Add to that they believe they are being persecuted and that their German heritage will explain how they will eventually react, and it becomes more chilling.

Octopath Traveler 2 and Deep Rock Galactic. Oh, and Grounded, when all 3 of us have time.

Won’t someone think of the poor capitalists who can’t love better lives then those around them!

/s, just in case.

I mean, you’re right. Im getting ahead of myself.

Well at least we know the future FF8 will not be overly melodramatic, feature a card game, have a frustrating last boss nor a weird pop song interlude. Or the saddest of sad boys as the protagonist. All of that would age poorly (to me)

Took me a second to understand the article meant FF9 remake. Here I was worried a bunch of people thought they had hallucinated FF9, then thought I was one of them.

I think the heat is getting to me. Look forward to trying the remake when I’m less loopy.

Ok, so have the captured PCs overhear a conversation the cultists are having that they will execute them unless they can get a large ransom. Or better yet, have them mention they don’t have the money to disappear more people, and wish they could raise money somehow. Then the players can concoct a scheme to convince the cultists they could make them money somehow, like with a ransom. Then they have fun getting out of their clutches with a wild and zany plan.

Yeah I was wondering if it was an underhanded way to get rid of people without officially letting them go. Seems like a lot of time and money tracking people to do that though, so I really have to wonder if they’ve lost the plot, thus me leaning towards incompetence.

That all said, and to hedge my bets, I haven’t seen their Financials. Maybe the verification is using cheap labour like YouTube review systems, for instance, or maybe they are really bloated.

Put ya Hands up by Jadakis

Shipping up to Boston by Dropkick Murphys

Wings of Steel by Pegazus