Can you explain how they’re different? The definition I found makes them sound identical: “theft; the action or crime of stealing” (Oxford dictionary).

As a non-Englisman, I’d say it’s pretty normal for devices and house appliances to have physical text in English but software in another (local) language.

Here’s a good video that talks more about the power of the rich in SK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRgp8oBiAmw

So you’re saying a police giving chase is always as dangerous a driver as someone drunk beyond their ears? And a 10 min chase ending in a crash is always worse than someone driving around for an hour potentially running over several times more people only to then crash either way?

Of course in most cases I agree brute force is not the correct option, but there are situations where it’s needed.

This completely depends on the ratios and the crimes and a lot of other factors. What if the person fleeing is a suspected murderer? I’d rather see a police chase potentially endangering innocents than allowing someone definitely endangering innocents walk free.

Another example, which is very common, is that the person fleeing is under the influence of some drug. Allowing that person to drive off is also endangering innocents, sometimes more and sometimes less than a police chase would.

My point is that police chases are not something you can just get rid of completely and think you’re protecting the public. But I agree with the purpose of the article, if there has been a huge increase in dangerous police chases after some change in leadership, it’s very likely that the police are to blame for bad decision making on whether to give chase or not.

Again, as I said before, my original comment was replying to the idea of never giving chase and always trying to catch them later, which is not always the best option.

That’s not comparable lol? You do realise it’s possible for police to give chase without endangering the surrounding people?

If it’s a common occurrence that innocents are being endangered by police chases then the police are obviously to be blamed for dangerous pursuits.

My former comment was simply stating the reason why police give chase at all, instead of letting everyone off the hook if they feel like not stopping. Not really sure why people are downvoting…

The issue is if the driver can get out of sight of all cameras/helicopters and leave the vehicle. Then there’s no proof they were actually driving and could claim the vehicle was stolen or something.

It’s where they filmed the ads for the car brands VAudi, WolksVagen and MazDa.

It’s not a mistake. The person of the year is not by definition a good person, but someone who’s had a lot of influence during the year, for better or for worse.

In the ranking’s six edition, researchers looked at […] autonomous vehicles and robotaxis

I guess the metric is more about a best case scenario (meaning they assume no traffic and only one individual’s transport needs), not about public transport.

I struggled too, turns out you have to rewrite the whole word in the box, not just the missing vowel.

Nonono, blockchained AI powered pods!

Thanks for linking to the wiki page. Now I know what I don’t need to read since I also knew exactly what Web 3.0 was.

Depends on the size of the area you’re considering. In some area, one nuke would blow up 100% of the mines. But in some other, larger, area, it would only blow up 50%.

But to be fair, using nukes to clear mines is probably one of the least effective methods considering all the collateral damage on villages, fields and nature.

“Your body - your choice” refers to the basic human right that you’re your own master and no one else can own/control you.

It’s especially used in the discussion about whether abortion should be legal or not, where it refers to the fact that the fetus in a pregnant person is indeed part of that person, and they are allowed to do what they want with their own body (e.g. abortion).

The post mentions the opposite, “your body, our choice” which refers to the anti-abortion movement where people, often due to religious reasons, think they should have control over a pregnant person’s body, rather than the pregnant person themself.

So it’s basically the difference between D and R early votes in Clark County?

What does the Clark firewall refer to?

So how would this system prevent people from voting multiple times or voting as someone they’re not? Could you elaborate on what you meant when you said “alternative ways”? I’m imagining something like fingerprints or retina scans, both of which take more time and money than a simple ID.

Also I’m not too familiar with the DMV, but isn’t that for driver’s licenses only? Surely that’s not the only way to get an ID in the US?

I guess my point is rather than allowing voting without ID, there should be better systems in place to provide everyone with an ID.

Why are democrats not as supportive of ID laws? I would assume it’s obvious you need an ID to vote, or am I missing something here?

THERE AREN’T COUGARS IN GARDENS! (It’s a reference, let’s see if someone gets it)