data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19131/191313bb123e934cbca7624120283bae872821a9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48fbf/48fbfe03fae4dd8d481fca302ba41d13ce8c6986" alt=""
I mean what a wrong headline. They found that most payments simply did not fill out what the payment was for in the cell as it is optional. It means they can’t read what it was for directly without asking, not that no one knows where the money went.
I mean what a wrong headline. They found that most payments simply did not fill out what the payment was for in the cell as it is optional. It means they can’t read what it was for directly without asking, not that no one knows where the money went.
So have you tried pressing enter or did you click the top thing under the URL bar dropdown that said “google search result” cuz uhhhhhh
Thanks for the recommendation!
I’m sorry… she sounds sexist because when she talked about the article on her at nasa she mentioned… her dreams… her being raised poor… her being homeless… and… her getting a job at Nasa despite all that. Huh oh wait weird I missed the part where she made it all about her being a woman? because… she didn’t even do that? She wasn’t even highlighting that she is important as a role model to women in STEM. Didn’t even mention it in the part discussing the article that was erased. She was highlighting being a role model of achieving her dream job even though she was poor and homeless at one point. And was simply pointing out that it is being erased BECAUSE she is a woman. and you are calling HER sexist? Are you high? Can you read? You just enter a fugue state when you see the word women and make shit up that didn’t happen so you can feel better about yourself? Cuz I’m super confused how you can get sexist from what she said without just assuming she’s sexist because she is a woman.
Because destabilizing mexico so we have an influx of cheap labor has been the point since we were building fucking railroads.
basically, old admin flaked out, but psyched out current admins thinking they would be able to get domain access to prevent this, so they did not finish developing their plan for when this happened.
Their tuta email already is post quantum so it’s not that they can’t do the security part. Idk honestly, it’s probably just the logistics of getting a lot more servers if they’re trying to make a secure cloud. I just know they posted they’ll be developing that in the future 2 years ago, now would be a great time for it to release as an alternative.
Wait what I’m sitting here using Memmy lol. I guess I should move on? Why is it dead?
1gb or 5gb for $5 a month is kinda rough tho, as a heads up to anyone looking, it is there more as a means to encrypted collaboration, not large storage and sharing of files.
Thanks. Made the swap to Tuta as it’s the only thing I haven’t moved away from Google yet. See Tuta mention 2 years ago they’re making a drive alternative but… that’s still not a thing. Kinda sad would definitely like that.
Tuta is supposed to be developing one that’s using their post-quantum encryption but it’s been 2 years so, womp.
“Sorry sir the full report will take long we’ll go ahead and get you what we can starting chronologically” start with every research from 1807. Next week they get every paper from 1808.
Man if only there was something dems could learn from this by looking at the difference between those two campaigns…. Hmm…. Change…. And nothing will change…. Hmmmm…… nope can’t find a difference, maybe it means we should move to the center.
I mean dude already trying to stop public debts which are supposed to be constitutionally protected. So not a surprise to see that.
Honestly, posting to see if anyone has strong feelings about any.
I’d had a vegan European style butter from someone that was really good… but I have no idea who it was anymore. Most all generally taste the same.
I just mean the word fucking “bias” is censored also. Which is insane. Papers often have a section where they detail how they removed/avoided bias from their study. Didn’t mean you’re biased. Was just agreeing they’re just using blanket science words that will get basically every paper ever flagged.
Talking about REMOVING BIAS from your scientific study? How DARE you.
Sure just kill 12 specific kids across the entire US in the name of “being fair”. Fuck those 12 kids. How DARE they exist.
No. The party not being sold should be able to void the contract if they want at that time. It should not automatically be voided. I could just make contracts saying I’ll pay you 1 trillion over 5 years, get whatever from you, then sell my company to void it so I don’t have to pay, uphold my end, or etc.