catonkatonk [none/use name]

Harris wins but before inauguration, someone manages to assassinate Trump. In respect for the fallen hero, Harris cedes her victory to Vance, the next and last American president.

I saw him answer that question by saying that he’s against sanctions on principle, look at how much damage they’re doing to Cuba etc. Unreal.

Did the title of the video change? I swear I saw it say “genocide” instead of “war” when I loaded YouTube this morning…

We should allow her to do a little genocide, as a treat.

Not my dumb ass reading that tweet and being like, “Oh wow, I’ve never even heard of this dude, I better google Vla-Dameer Leonin”.

But yes, you’re absolutely right. Now that I understand it. How’s it even supposed to be funny?

If Trump wins, he will dismantle all of America’s institutions, declare himself God Emperor for life and genocide all minorities.

If Kamala wins, she won’t be able to do anything unless the republicans let her.

On the plus side, if they’ve now adopted “build the wall”, we might only be eight years away from “lock her up” being official dem policy.

There is the unfortunate fact that I do think the American people are just genuinely more right wing on certain topics than we care to admit, I.e. immigration and trans rights.

I don’t think these reactionary ideas fell out of a coconut tree.

We can only ever expect the managerial class to double-down on mediocrity.

The Labour Party that won 33% of an election that had an almost record-low turnout. lmao.

Good.

Our noble child touchers

Democrats can dress atrocity in just enough respectability to placate libs. Sure, there are terrible things happening in the world, but the Leader is so sad about it, so it must be that the terrible things are unavoidable and therefore everything is as okay as they can possibly be.

Trump, enacting the same policies but also revelling in their cruelly would make steam come out of a lib’s ears.

Always twirling towards freedom.

I immediately suspected this when I saw “country over party”, which was Sturmer’s motto.

Anyway, the “major victory” they speak of refers to Starmer’s Labour getting less votes than Corbyn’s Labour despite having all the press on side. Good luck.

So they’re not even going to bother to defend the oil fields around West Asia, am I understanding this correctly?

“Honesty on economy” means that they admitted that they had “no choice” but to economically spank the country. Luckily, Britain’s really into that.

IIRC, the architect of UK austerity, George Osbourne, was writing about how we needed to cut government spending well before the financial crisis. Possibly while the government was still posting surpluses (which it has not done since austerity began lollol)

The starvation will continue until the economy fattens.