List comprehensions return a new list. For the sake of code clarity, you probably shouldn’t change a second list from within a list comprehension. If you’re trying to concatenate two lists, you can do so in a second line:
a = list(range(10))
b = [ value for value in range(5) ]
a.extend(b)
# a has 15 elements
print(a)
I bet he’ll be able to retire at 3 years old with this many jobs
guns don’t kill people, toddlers do
That’s more like an excuse to keep those stupid 5, 6, and even more interview round processes. Basically making you work an entire week for free in exchange of a chance of getting an offer. Make the first or second rounds with AI and only bother after that.
100k hl = 10 Ml ~ 4 Olympic swimming pools
color chart ranges from 4 to 280 swimming pools of annual production
The banking system in the US is a legacy mess. Transfers still take business days to go through and making your bank account # and routing information available is actually a security concern, honestly I don’t even know why that’s still a thing.
Products like PayPal and Plaid try to provide something that is slightly more usable, but with this underlying obsolescence their functionality is very limited.
When paying for services, credit cards are still the way to do it. For P2P payments, people use PayPal, Venmo, Cash App, and others. Nothing even close to a unified system like Pix in Brazil.
just a bulk purchase
These things can just be unique fields. I think the takeaway here is exactly to not use these unique fields as database keys if you have the option / if it’s up to you.
I received an email about this one year ago from one of the universities technicians/systems maintainer to let them know if we were running non-openjdk java runtimes because they received a million-dollar “warning” email. Greedy corps are even going after universities.
if your tractor can’t run farming simulator, is it even a tractor?
surely these are things that should be considered, but they move in relation to what? And is this surprising amount of any significance for tens or hundreds of miles of rail?
yeah, who knows - some people might rather waste time fighting a language model than actually learning things…
it’s too early for something like this imo, but maybe in a few years it serves a purpose
you’re thinking anywhere on the platform, I’m suggesting a known place near a station by which the train passes and its location - at that moment - is known.
All the system needs is a ground-truth location after a certain amount of time. GPS is just a cheap and convenient way to do it almost anywhere, but this location correction doesn’t need to be satellite-based at all.
the initial location doesn’t need to be GPS, just a known anchor location. Which is trivial to implement in the case of trains, since stations don’t move that drastically.
a lot cooler
ice what you did there
long-term inertial guidance
this is exactly what I got from the article: a more accurate inertial navigation. What part violates relativity?
“replacing GPS” is a stretch, but it’s some sci-fi tech to use when GPS can’t be used
ok, then write a module. I’m not sure what’s being asked. The best way is what works well for you.