![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
Enough. Feel free to continue believing that, on the balance of probabilities, this tomb is that of the really real Jesus.
Enough. Feel free to continue believing that, on the balance of probabilities, this tomb is that of the really real Jesus.
That’s just not true.
Sure ok you might not see how many upvotes a user has received but that’s not how vote manipulation works.
Votes influence what you see, and perhaps more importantly they influence what users perceive to be popular opinions.
Upvotes for “genocide joe” comments are a good example. A few people can make an idea seem like it’s mainstream.
The problem with this, is that it only blocks posts. You’re still going to see comments, and posts and comments are still subject to vote manipulation.
If you’re happy with this type of calculation then the probability that this tomb is that of biblical Jesus is (number of occupants) / (number of humans in that area at the time the tomb was built).
If it was just about transparency he would’ve released it sooner.
Sitting on it to release at the right time was partisan.
He released information relating to government officials engaging in misconduct
… at precisely the right time to maximise the effect of the release and diminish her chances at winning the election.
No whistleblowers shouldn’t go to prison, I’m glad Assange is going home but I do dislike him immensely.
Of course you can.
I’m unable to calculate the probability that the moon will fall out of the sky tonight but I know that the probability is very low.
We might not be able to calculate the probability but we can conclude that the chances that this tomb is that of Jesus is infinitesimal.
This. It’s not just a switch to be flipped.
What’s done is done. From day 1 after the referendum it was obvious to everyone that the UK would spend the next 50 years trying to mitigate the impact of that ridiculous decision. Hotting the “rejoin” button is not necessarily a short cut to the end.
That’s not what they said.
This conclusion, while weakly supported by a statistical analysis of the names involved, is rejected by most archaeologists, theologians, linguistic and biblical scholars.
There’s a bunch of references for archaeologists debunking it.
I know you said “it might not be him” but I feel like that understates the weight of evidence against that possibility.
Well it’s made a lot of people feel satisfied that they’ve done their bit and had their say.
Is that the definition of CSAM?
I don’t think anyone is saying he has literal wounds from defending religion.
Google has really masterfully re-defined privacy to mean letting them look after all your private stuff.
Trespass can mean merely imposing on the rights of another.
So if one is entitled to privacy on their property, then flying a drone over it is trespass.
It’s not that.
Outraging the left fires his base.
sweet. thanks.
INPUT will need to be DOCKER-USER in your script but otherwise I’ll see how it goes.
WDYM?
Brigadeers can just upvote comments supporting their position and exclude contrary ones.