minus-squaregracicot@discuss.tchncs.detoC++@programming.dev•The move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thinglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThis is actually what I did. I declared it and left a comment to explain why it needed to be left unimplemented. linkfedilink
gracicot@discuss.tchncs.de to C++@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · 1 year agoThe move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thingplus-squaredevblogs.microsoft.comexternal-linkmessage-square0fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkThe move constructor that you have to declare, even though you don't want anyone to actually call it - The Old New Thingplus-squaredevblogs.microsoft.comgracicot@discuss.tchncs.de to C++@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square0fedilink
gracicot@discuss.tchncs.de to C++@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · edit-21 year agoTrip report: Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)plus-squareherbsutter.comexternal-linkmessage-square0fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTrip report: Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)plus-squareherbsutter.comgracicot@discuss.tchncs.de to C++@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square0fedilink
This is actually what I did. I declared it and left a comment to explain why it needed to be left unimplemented.