That’s already the case, however, the key word is “compatible”. They define it differently than you.
They’d just replace him with a clone who has an MBA from business school. The CEOs are just a symptom, not the actual problem.
Why not? If a user wants to use their computer in that way, why should they not be allowed to?
It’s done all the time. How many senseless action movies with wooden actors have made a kabillion dollars at the box office? Lots of them!
We were taught that you got shocked, unless you died, then you were electrocuted.
“Electrocuted to death”. . .
Isn’t that just electrocuted?
It’s not just that. I work, struggle financially, have a family, take care of the house. But I also struggle to be hopeful for the future. Doing all those things can give you a purpose, if you feel like it will end positively. When the future starts to look more and more bleak, the struggle is only a struggle to survive, not a noble, valiant fight that you think you will win.
They are not upset that it is neglected. They’d rather they were left alone to do their thing. They feel like they are being attacked, because everyone else is trying to drag them into the 21st century.
I don’t understand the sentiment. Any dumbass can buy socks. It’s a thoughtless present. How about get me something I really want?
Why is the man’s POV a close-up?
Your wife/gf cut it up for rags.
Amazon is prime