Because that would be fucking weird.

This is who will get replaced first, and they don’t want to see it. They’re the most important, valuable part of the company in their own mind, yet that was the one thing the AI got right, the management part. It still needed the creative mind of a human programmer to do the code properly, or think outside the box.

There were still bugs. You just learned how to deal with them or work around them.

They’ll just make a fee for having to list their fees, and make the consumer pay for it.

Because selling the notion of “trickle down” economics is extremely profitable for those at the top. It keeps stringing people along believing that if we just give more money to and ask for less from our corporate benefactors, eventually we’ll all benefit somehow by them expanding their businesses and creating more slave wage jobs.

But you’re supposed to pick a side and be willing to literally lay down your life for them and their cause! Ra ra, go team go. Otherwise you’re just part of the problem according to either side.

I agree with you and I’ll go a step further and say fuck all politicians in general. Today, they’re all owned in some way by the money that puts them in power. They’ll all tell you what you want to hear. They’re all experts in half truths. Never trust a politician.

Now that’s a thought. An unwitting corrupt politician honey pot.

I don’t think you quite grasp how enormously big space is.

No, that is literally solving the problem. You can’t make it clean. What exactly would we need to protect out in space or say the moon? The space whales, or moon frogs? You’re protecting nothing but the vacuum of space and some rocks.

No one give a shit about iMessage. I’ve watched my kids exclusively communicate with their friends via Snapchat and discord.

Have a buddy that will buy 24 packs of that hot garbage for parties or get togethers. Either that or Keystone light. Not really sure why I’m friends with him…

I’ve also been a subscriber for the last 4 years or so and seeing all of this is making me wonder if I’m subscribed to the same Spotify they are. I’ve had none of these issues.

Same. I’ve seen multiple people say this here and I’ve yet to experience it. Makes me wonder if the particular podcasters they’re listening to have opted in to some sort of ad revenue thing from Spotify.

Tax write off perhaps?

Chop one head off…

While technically correct,

I’m old enough to remember when we were all gonna get cancer and die by being fried with UV rays because we were making huge holes in the ozone by dumping metric fucktons of CFCs into the atmosphere. I also remember there being a huge push that we stop doing the thing that was causing the problem, you know before we all die from cancer.

Saving the ozone, and therefore climate wasn’t in the constitution then either, but we (at least as far as the US’s involvement) did it because it was the right goddamn thing to do.

We shouldn’t have to have children essentially begging the government to make decisions to protect their future. Who keeps electing these assholes?

All this talk of state-sponsored/subsidized news/media gives me the wiggins, at least as someone who lives in the US. I’m sure people smarter than myself could come up with a bullet proof system to prevent abuse, but really, I would have little faith it would stand the test of time. I feel like any protections you put in place would be eroded eventually. All it takes is one “emergency” or “disaster”. Maybe I’m wrong. It just feels so 1984ish.

Fuck it, I’m moving over to Seamonkey.

You’re not wrong.

Any one of us who actually codes/scripts knows ChatGPT spits out hot garbage when asked to produce anything beyond maybe a single short one or two line code snippet or bash/powershell command. Like the article said the AI lacks context of what you’re trying to do. It will confidently spit out either completely wrong or made up code with commands that don’t even exist.

Also, this will go really fucking well. Don’t give them any ideas.

Kabir said, "From our findings and observation from this research, we would suggest that Stack Overflow may want to incorporate effective methods to detect toxicity and negative sentiments in comments and answers in order to improve sentiment and politeness.