I meant to say that part is already a complete sentence.
I meant to say that part is already a complete sentence.
Isn’t the first mistake simply him using the sentence to declare there is irony? How is that an incomplete sentence?
No, you’re unhinged because I only asked for a proper explanation of the things you listed in your initial comment, but you keep spouting stuff that doesn’t seem related to it at all.
Now I see you were talking about his policies regarding Israel, but neither Biden’s support for Israel’s atrocity or his banning of Chinese products makes him a fascist. A supporter of genocide and a racist, maybe, but I don’t see what relation that has with calling him the most fascist president.
Bro, stop spouting off about unrelated things and explain the ones you mentioned in first comment already. You’re just making yourself look unhinged at this point.
No, we’re saying we need more explanation for the things you’ve listed. I can’t connect them to anything I’ve heard off the top of my head.
It’s actually the 3rd panel that is the odd one out, since the 4th panel kept the orientation of both characters from the 1st and 2nd panels.
Any 8 years old hard drive is a concern. Don’t get sucked into thinking Seagate is a bad brand because of anecdotal evidence. He might’ve bought a Seagate hard drive with manufacturing defect, but actual data don’t really show any particular brand with worse reliability, IIRC. What you should do is research whether the particular model of your drive is known to have reliability problems or not. That’s a better indicator than the brand.
But do you know anyone who calls the time before sunrise broad daylight? I would call that dusk, wouldn’t you? And is 2 am nighttime or morning?
Can you prove this?
Tell me what are the factual standards for nighttime and broad daylight, again?
Everyone needs the /s. It’s simply text, there is no tone to judge your sarcasm by.
Did you know that correcting grammar mistakes does not make you a grammar nazi? If the guy was being condescending when providing the correction, then he is one. Simply giving the correct word to use in a simple and concise way is completely fine. Your over-reaction to his comment is the unreasonable one in this case.
How small has that list become at this point?
You also need the right Bluray drive that can be re-flashed before you can extract the contents. If only it was as easy as DVDs.
IF it exists in their country. It also requires enough people to buy the new ones first for it to be available for the second hand market.
Yeah, that’s a good point.
So it would still be a bar graph. I thought your argument was that it wasn’t the right type of graph for this dataset, not that you disagreed with the dataset used in the first place. I agree that the one you proposed is easier to understood, but I don’t really agree that using it like they did is improper. It is certainly useful if you want to save space.
What graph works better to show relative percentage change?
Well, let’s hope the second part of you is right.
I guess if he wrote “That’s irony right there”, it would be easier to consider it a complete sentence, so maybe you’re right.