I have dvds with the original trilogy

I assume these are the bonus discs in the 2006 release?

My video and audio is probably better than theirs anyway

If you pride yourself on your home theatre system, you may want to look into “Harmy Despecialized” and “4k77”. The 2006 DVDs are generally regarded as poor quality, as they are non-anamorphic video sourced from the 1993 LaserDisc releases.

And a bit of a spiritual successor to the Space Shuttle as well. Still has the advantages of a spaceplane, but mitigates the major risks of the Shuttle design.

Yeah, I think the fraction of Redditors (even among those who are interested in Lemmy) who already use Matrix is pretty small. Asking them to sign up for yet another service to debug Lemmy issues will turn people away.

Fortunately, kersploosh has volunteered to be an ambassador for sh.itjust.works on Reddit.

Even when it is displayed “as expected” as you put it, it seems to be displaying a thumbnail preview of the website rather than embedding the image directly. I’m experiencing a similar problem in Thunder.

we need voting reform so bad

Indeed: [email protected]

Aw, poor Hobbes!

Mostly miscellaneous podcasts.

Sniff looms ominously with a pair of scissors…

Ah… originaltrilogy.com. Those folks deserve some sort of cultural preservation award for what they’ve done for Star Wars.

Did I miss the Ioniq 7 and 8, or are they being released out of order?

And some competition for SpaceX. Not particularly stiff competition, but it at least it’s something.

While passive, noncontrolling stakes from foreign investors are welcome, it is the Trump administration’s position that adversaries like China use concealed investment strategies to obtain technologies, IP, and leverage in strategic industries.

I’m not an expert in international investment or intellectual property. How could a concealed investment strategy lead to obtaining IP?

[email protected]

Pity there’s no lemmy.aq…

Yeah, I guess this makes sense. Although, Polaris II was originally proposed to be a potential Hubble servicing mission, which NASA declined. Perhaps Isaacman might be in a position to reopen those discussions?

Thanks! Added.

Maybe wait another week, perhaps early April? (But not April Fools day, as that could be confusing.)

Where would we go? [email protected]?

How so? I hope we get good views.

i also wonder how the duplicates between instances will pan out. the fragmentation of pretty small communities isn’t great imo

Yeah, that can be problematic. I put together a guide on consolidation over on [email protected].

Definitely one of the wilder mission names, even for Rocket Lab.

Does this mean that the entire Polaris program would be cancelled, or just that he would not fly on the missions?