I too wouldn’t shake the hands of a person who’s from the country currently invading, pillaging, and raping my land and its people.
I’m not saying that I would. I was explaining that since covid there is precedent to allow not shaking hands.
So if you don’t get playing it now then you still can in future.
Only when online and DRM servers are up
How much energy do geothermal plants produce in Europe lmao
How is that related to your statement “feeding warm water into the river is a grave danger while regulations for other types of thermoelectric plants are much more relaxed”?
Not at all? You’re trying to move goalposts because your argument was insane? Good.
You guys are delusional
You’re a pro nuclear propagandist.
now you’re complaining she doesn’t like you?
A hand shake is usually mandatory in fencing tournaments. I think it was initially weakened as part of distancing rules during Covid but the rules are still in place: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/27/world/europe/ukraine-fencer-olga-kharlan-russia.html
Russian Maya Guchmazova, who represented Georgia.
So pathetic that all over professional sports, Russians are just able to declare they represent different countries (or the neutral flag) and just continue.
When a Ubisoft game gets delisted:
Warm water from geothermal plants isn’t dumped into rivers. It’s pumped back underground to boil and heat the turbines again.
My personal view is that I rather have more traditional gameplay than upgrade trees and whatnot.
Game engines can’t be LGPL because of console SDK NDAs. At best MPL.
Sure but that attitude doesn’t help game developers looking to make a living selling console games. Godot with its licensing, helped by Unity messing up big time, is about to become the entry level game engine… The engine universities and self-taught game developers will likely use it as learning tool. Godot got a big influx of donations even though it’s under a permissive license. Small indies don’t care to modify the core engine anyway. Most GZDoom games on Steam are living proof of that. Game logic in separate scripts isn’t covered by the interpreter’s license anyway.
It’s weird American spelling where they removed the u from ou in many words because they sent telegrams and those were paid by the letter.
Does absolutely everyone have to consent to having the license changed?
Very minor changes (like fixing typos in comments) aren’t copyrightable, so these changes don’t require approval. When LibreOffice was relicensed, IIRC they they had some cutoff regarding lines of code.
LGPL
Depending on the provisions of a console’s SDK, that may be not an option because you may be able to deduct some of the SDK’s working from the released source code and that may violate the NDA.
Regulations prevent water being backfed to the river at too much of a warm temperature.
Of course, because it would kill the entire river ecosystem otherwise.
People generally aren’t surprised by the effects of the MIT license, they’re surprised by the behavior of other humans.
Wait, people give other people the right to make proprietary variants of released source code and then are surprised when they exercise that right?
Less permissive licenses protect against that.
No, other licenses don’t protect against not understanding which rights are granted. The GPL, for example, allows to make proprietary web services using GPL code and to never release any modifications to that code. Many people were very surprised many years ago that some web-based messenger could use Pidgin’s libpurple to connect to ICQ etc. without ever giving anything back.
It’s not. https://fedia.io/register
They certainly removed the register link from the header bar and at some point announced that to keep server costs in check, registrations would be closed. I don’t know if you can successfully submit a registration when opening that address directly but considering that the admins don’t want additional users for understandable reasons, I’m not going to try what happens.
Edit: Oh the register link is there under the login window. Seems they reversed their decision, maybe after enough donations arrived. Very good.
No problem: French nuclear reactors need to lower output in hot summers anyway because that shit relies on river water to be cold enough for cooling. Then they buy electricity from neighboring countries.
I think you’re ignoring that most people wouldn’t want their code used like that.
That’s why you should read and understand a license before choosing it. MIT license is just a couple of lines of easy language, so it’s not like you need a degree to understand basic English. Anybody who’s surprised by the contents of the MIT license has no sympathy from me. Reading the text requires no more than one minute of time.
And if I were to reverse-engineer a binary then I could still add that code to my software.
That’s actually an important factor for ancient software whose source code was lost. A developer could, for example, declare all their old Atari 2600 games to be under GPL by just announcing it in their news blog. Collectors could then hunt for the binary files and decompile them. Decompiled software is still a derivative work, so that source code would still be under GPL. Sadly I’m just aware of one case from years ago where I can’t even remember the specifics who and which software it was but he was like “I found some floppy disks from the 1980s, I lost the source code but binaries under GPL, so have fun”.
No.