• 35 Posts
  • 323 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • This.

    Media has always had an agenda, which even if meant in good faith is manipulativ.

    Just speaking about newspapers:

    • the topics are mostly chosen for the audience who can afford newspapers (= good/settled middle class)
    • the journalists usually have a social background which allows for having unpaid internships and can afford to study journalism at university (e.g. rules out working class people)
    • advertisement is a big (paid newspapers) or the only income source (‘free online news’)
      • this implies to not fuck around with the companies/people paying the advertisement
      • this implies also, to not fuck around with the world view of what your readers seem acceptable too much (less readers = less money for advertisement)
    • newspapers are owned by rich people which also impacts what topics are covered or not
    • newspapers have competition in search engines/internet etc. which they will fight / badmouth
    • in Germany at least newspapers/their companies tried to fight adblockers and the peoples freedom to use adblockers in court - w/o making much noise about it. So, information damaging the newspapers reputation are willfully held back.
    • every topic I have a little bit of knowledge about which is covered by so called specialists in newspapers is full of shit/wrong assumptions/lacks any kind of deeper understanding

    Long story short: Everyone/everywhere has grown up consuming deeply manipulative content from media. Given the bullshit and propaganda we are getting each day by people with an agenda/on someones payroll, crazy hallucinations / generated content won’t make things worse than they are already.



    • Learn a proper tooth brushing technique (Bass, Stillman, etc.)
    • Floss
    • Strength training 2x a week
    • Get some daylight every day
    • Have great manners all the time
    • Be nice and respectful to people around you (especially the ones you don’t benefit from)
    • Read the classic books in literature and your field of work
    • Get a hobby and follow it with discipline
    • Go to the free health checkups that are provided to you
    • Save early and regularly
    • Plan your next day, week, month, year
    • Have some fun and spent yourself from time to time on your own terms - YOLO ;-)










  • The CEO is for a good reason an easy target: Show me another company where this level of incompetence is rewarded with steady salary increases?!? (I am afraid you’ll be able to. ;-))

    Given your calculation is correct, you are correct that paying the CEO nothing would not make a big difference for Mozillas income. Although it would hopefully open the road for a better CEO.

    Your argument that hitting at the CEO ignores the whole context of market dominance of Google could IMHO also used against your argument: If the CEO is so powerless that she cannot take the responsibility for the decline of Mozilla, than why does she get payed at all. If all is a function of the environment and the tides of the market, we can easily replace her with ChatGPT and have the same results w/o wasting money.

    At the end of the day, we are exactly where we have been literally a decade ago: Finding a sustainable business model for Mozilla/Firefox. Once more: This core problem of Mozilla/Firefox has been well known for over a decade by now, and again the CEOs only answer is advertisement. Why do we pay money for the bullshit every first semester MBA student would come up with a brainstorming within the first 3 minutes.

    Mozilla survives thanks to Google and their (rightful) fears of being outed as a monopoly.

    The discussion is always if Mozilla could survive on donations. I do not now if they could. I still think there are a lot of actors with an interest of an independent browser, even whole governments. What I know for sure is, I won’t donate to Mozilla as long as incompetent CEOs are payed.








  • Nice, I like it very much when one can separate between personal fit and quality! :-)

    For me the whole point of the book is to accept the story, while your own sense/mind tells you to not play along, which made me reflect about how much - dare I say everyone of us - plays along everyday… Besides this, I simply like Ishiguros writing style (non native English speaker here, so wonder what a native would think about it.)

    Would love to get a list of books from you that you respect and like (or respect and don’t like ;-)).





  • wolftoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat is your favorite movie of all time?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    One is not enough, and a lot of great movies where already named, still, some great movies are missing:

    • Heat (Michael Mann) Every single time I see it, it is brilliant and I discover something new
    • Jin Roh (The original animation movie), awesome atmosphere and only after the 2nd viewing one can really appreciate it
    • Near Dark (1987) Why the hell did nobody ever produce something like this ever again?
    • Miami Vice (Michael Mann), ‘Style over substance’, in a great way, although I have the shaky camera
    • Seven Samurai
    • Casablanca
    • Strange Days
    • Point Break
    • XXX (Nobody understood that it was a parody back in the days :-P)
    • What we do in the shadows
    • Brazil
    • Rocky
    • Eternal Sunshine …
    • The city of lost children
    • Leon the professional
    • Dolls
    • The Killer (The original of course)
    • The last unicorn
    • Dark City
    • The thing
    • The Lost Boys
    • Spirited Away
    • Donnie Darko
    • Rashomon
    • Brother (2000)
    • Parasite
    • Hatsukoi (First Love)

    … from the top of my mind. :-P