The onclick takes JS code. The JS function called “update” updates the perchance stuff across the whole page. If you pass an element to the update function, it will only update that element.
So in my test, I have an element with the id “output.” So just passing output to the update() function means I’m passing a reference to that element with the id “output.” And then only that element is updated.
Well done! If you let me know where to look, I’ll check it out :D
I’ve made a separate example. While yours may have been simplified there was still a lot of complexity and redirection throughout the perchance code which made it hard to really know what’s what.
This example does what you want (I think), and is also very simple. I hope it helps. https://perchance.org/hw714l9a98#edit
A heads up: sign up, and while logged in you won’t get ads anyway.
Like the ai character chat?
You know anyone can make their own AI text generator, right?
Could you remove that giant thumbnail perhaps? Might have to remove the link of the post, and just put it in the body to do that. It’s just taking over the main feed pretty heavily unfortunately. I don’t know why it works like that on here.
What do you do to make it public? And what happens?
Ah cool. That fits.
You need to @[email protected] in a comment for them to get pinged, apparently.
My 2 cents… The way I’d like to see that implemented is, if the target gallery is changed you’re allowed to click the “save to gallery” button again.
Cool, cheers 👍
Nice feature, by the way.
There is no such set of terms it understands. There’s just the process of trying different terms, and seeing what happens. It’s not a rigorous structured database. It’s an amorphous blob of abstract meaning linking even more amorphous probability spaces of different kinds of images linked to words images were tagged with before it was trained on them.
I’d just google it. 🤷
Something to bear in mind though is that in general, the fewer prompt terms, the better. You can have gargantuan, monolithic walls of text as prompts and negative prompts… which will take more time for the engine to process and generate from, and is more likely to produce the weird artefacts you’re trying to avoid.
Just something to think about.
Copy the address of the generator. Paste it here.
Save the evaluated prompt text first. Then use that for the image options object, and the display of the text in the page.
To evaluate a randomising piece of text like that, reference it like this: []
To save that into a variable, do something like this: [] Have that run before referencing it using [] in the image options, and in the page.
Tricky thing is, the AI is fed what it has said before so it can continue the thread. I’m guessing that’s the issue–it’s reinforcing itself, making that aspect stronger and stronger in its own prompting.
No idea how to fix it though 😅
Are you trying to make a new generator? How is this related to the character you have on the character AI chat?