• JasonDJ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    From my perspective, they are implying that your belief that voting third party or abstaining gives you a clear conscience makes you a self-centered, arrogant fool. Because the result of your action (or inaction) will increase the likelihood of the more bad thing happening.

    To me, that’s not a clear conscience. That’s ignorance. That’s explicitly choosing to ignore the consequences of your (in)action. That’s short-sightedness to the degree that someone would expect of a preschooler. One with behavioral problems.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s a lot of words to say you are okay with genocide. I’m not gonna castigate voters for voting against a candidate that enables it. Maybe I’ll change my mind once I get to middle school. It depends on how long recess is.

      • JasonDJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I did not say I’m okay with genocide.

        Our choices this election are genocide with a side of an untoppped baked potato, or genocide with a side of radioactive flaming diarrhea.

        There is no third option. The third option is that the waiter brings you one of the two and you have to accept it.

        At least one way, we get a bland potato. It sucks, but that’s the way this restaurant is run. We can’t just get up and go to another restaurant. But, maybe if we can just find it to ignore the genocide (which, by the way, the chef is really limited in what they can do without the support of the rôtisseur, especially when he gets a couple line cooks to side with him), we might be able to have no genocide next time we come back. Otherwise, we’re all gonna get sick being close to all the radioactive diarrhea and the whole place is gonna get shut down.