I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • stoy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You raise some very good points, I don’t want to pretend to have all answers.

    Sex work is vulnerable work, and much depends on all parties involved earnestly waning to make and keep it safe.

    As I was typing this, I thought that since we can’t trust the private sector with this, what about forming a government agency to deal with licensing and care of sex workers.

    But I quickly realized that the organizational issues are just part of the issues, there have been many, many examples of administrators abusing their position.

    There is no quick fix for this, the one thing I can think of is a cultural shift to raise the status of the work, then it could be a way forward, but this takes time.

    • viscacha@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      While I generally agree with your way of thinking, one problem I see is that higher status sex work (i.e. escort services) are not the issue but are already very expensive. The issues get more severe the closer you get to the lower end of the spectrum. And there it gets difficult in judging or controlling what really is voluntary and equal exchange of values.

      More governmental control might be a solution worth exploring. This could also be realised by legalising sex work exclusively in controlled establishments. However that again leads to higher cost on all ends.

      Sweden has banned buying sex but not offering it, so only the Johns are punished if caught. But that is no real solution imo and I am keen on seeing the long term effects of this.